Metalartin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jul 2015
- Messages
- 12,442
To be fair it's a publisher decision I would have thought and I can sort of see why, games tend to generally sell a lot better at full price than PC games do(and then there's the piracy thing). I personally think they make enough money off those that do pay full whack, which is pretty darn obscene with the amount of games publishers want people to buy given their target audience.The fact that Rockstar didn't release on pc is just pure greed, nothing else.
They want people to double dip. Go out and buy a console for the game, then go and buy the game on pc when it's released on that platform.
Clever marketing of course but a bit scummy imo
I never played the first RDR, I was actually thinking about getting the PC version at some point, so it's news to me that they never released it. I wonder what the reason was behind that? Rockstar used to primarily develop all their games on PC first and scale downwards even back in the PS2 days according to an interview I read a long while back.
On another note I don't like seeing Sony and MS pretty much paying developers not to release already popular franchises that were never really theirs to push their console sales, by that I mean games that probably should be multiplatform. Spiderman for example, I know they bought the film rights but Spiderman isn't and never will be a Sony character. I suppose it's all business at the end of the day, maybe it's always been this way but we never noticed or heard much about the inner workings that much.