My deep-seated hatred for Ladyman is starting to worry me.
he's a disgrace, he's deliberately being imflammatory to the extreme
My deep-seated hatred for Ladyman is starting to worry me.
Although he's a bit dim, he is a footballer, and he can only marvel at the quality of our players. He is paid to talk about what he see's on the pitch, and he comes at it from the perspective of a player. He knows there is an agenda; he's probably been in production meetings where the discussion was about slagging off City.To add a bit of balance I thought Robbie Savage was very fair last night. I don't know if anyone else noticed but every time his co-commentator tried to lead him down the road of the last week he said nothing, complete silence. The one time the other guy tried to have a dig you could hear him give a little sigh and then said, "Anyway" and went back to praising the team.
I disagree. Naga tends to be very vocal and the programme has gone down the Loose Women route. I think viewers tend to expect less insightful coverage.I think that was the impression they wanted to give but I believe it was a planned piece of dialogue disguised as naivety.
I think that if Shakhtar had been any good at all and got some players into our penalty area he would have found a reason to give them a penalty to even things up. As it was he missed a few possible penalties for us until that dreadful tackle on Silva gave him no option but to award a penalty.Maybe if Raz had gone to the ref and said he wasn't touched, he feared the referee would have booked him for diving. As a club City have always been pro VAR and last night it would have been a perfect situation for it.
It again demonstrated what a waste of time Harry Potter is at the side of the goal who must have had a clear view. The ref certainly seemed to not want to punish a number of fouls on City players in the second half as a way of righting a wrong.
Whenever I hear, see or read about Phil Thompson, Peter Reid's comments that were heard live on telly always comes to mind.
"Fuck off, big nose!"
Didn’t bother to read Luke Edwards nonsense in The Telegraph. Yes we got a dodgy pen, we didn’t appeal for it and I don’t remember a clamour for Milner to admit he touched the ball when Sane scored or Robertson put his hand up to taking Sterling down last year.Yeah. Guardian might be the best from all the trash then
Just to brighten everyones morning, this is a snippet from Phil Thompsons take on the Derby as published by Sky online ......
This is a huge problem for United, mainly due to the money Manchester City have - it's bottomless! At least at United it's kind of self-financing of what they generate but City have got a country running them. It's harsh but it's the way it is.
I'll leave it there.
Just to brighten everyones morning, this is a snippet from Phil Thompsons take on the Derby as published by Sky online ......
This is a huge problem for United, mainly due to the money Manchester City have - it's bottomless! At least at United it's kind of self-financing of what they generate but City have got a country running them. It's harsh but it's the way it is.
I'll leave it there.
To add a bit of balance I thought Robbie Savage was very fair last night. I don't know if anyone else noticed but every time his co-commentator tried to lead him down the road of the last week he said nothing, complete silence. The one time the other guy tried to have a dig you could hear him give a little sigh and then said, "Anyway" and went back to praising the team.
This is what Merson was doing just before he said thatWhy do that when you can quote:
Paul Merson
If Pep stays at City long-term, which is not a given as things can change quickly in football, then the power is with City. My slight worry with City is that there are no youngsters coming through. Phil Foden does not get a game, Jadon Sancho left - and City are not the youngest team in the world. If Pep had brought three or four kids through, then you would be thinking 'wow' but they have got the ammunition to buy the ready-made player.
Not the youngest team and no young players coming through you say?
BBC Sport news reporter covers the game.
They talk about the pen and how Sterling could have told the ref.
Female news reporter:
“That’s cheating isn’t it?”
I saw that. It was Naga Munchetty who said it, but I don't think she's that clued up on football. It was spoken from a naive position, understandable if you're not a regular watcher of any sport. The other presenters stayed out of it.
It's a bit like me asking why that rugby player didn't get banned for life for trying to gouge somebody's eye out.
I think that was the impression they wanted to give but I believe it was a planned piece of dialogue disguised as naivety.
This is what Merson was doing just before he said that![]()
Why do that when you can quote:
Paul Merson
If Pep stays at City long-term, which is not a given as things can change quickly in football, then the power is with City. My slight worry with City is that there are no youngsters coming through. Phil Foden does not get a game, Jadon Sancho left - and City are not the youngest team in the world. If Pep had brought three or four kids through, then you would be thinking 'wow' but they have got the ammunition to buy the ready-made player.
Not the youngest team and no young players coming through you say?
Why do that when you can quote:
Paul Merson
If Pep stays at City long-term, which is not a given as things can change quickly in football, then the power is with City. My slight worry with City is that there are no youngsters coming through. Phil Foden does not get a game, Jadon Sancho left - and City are not the youngest team in the world. If Pep had brought three or four kids through, then you would be thinking 'wow' but they have got the ammunition to buy the ready-made player.
Not the youngest team and no young players coming through you say?