Media coverage 2018/19

Status
Not open for further replies.
BBC Sports news24 just had a segment on tweets from giddy dippers celebrating their title win.

The clubs fault.

Should have strengthened properly in the summer.

Instead we stagnated yet again and have allowed Liverpool to overtake us allowing them to get all giddy.

Until the club stops putting the breaks on the moment we we win a title this shit from the media will keep happening.
 
The clubs fault.

Should have strengthened properly in the summer.

Instead we stagnated yet again and have allowed Liverpool to overtake us allowing them to get all giddy.

Until the club stops putting the breaks on the moment we we win a title this shit from the media will keep happening.
Not the clubs fault, Pep could have bought anyone he wanted, nothing to do with the City board.
 
I'm resigned to a lot of the shit we get in the media these days, but Keown's "financial doping?" comment felt like a step too far. The club should be all over that.

They certainly should be. The inference, once again, that we are somehow cheating. He likes the sound of his own voice, Keown, clearly isn't comfortable with dead air.

However, the lead commentator is equally culpable for his prepared notes, which he clearly wanted to use to cite how we had 17 players over the £20m one Newcastle have, yet can't see the hypocrisy in how often they mentioned Mike Ashley's running of the club.

Personally, we should demand a public apology from Keown and do the bare contractual minimum when it comes to BT and future coverage.

Certainly not affording them sit downs with Leroy Sane.
 
The clubs fault.

Should have strengthened properly in the summer.

Instead we stagnated yet again and have allowed Liverpool to overtake us allowing them to get all giddy.

Until the club stops putting the breaks on the moment we we win a title this shit from the media will keep happening.


They need your input on the board .
 
BBC Sports news24 just had a segment on tweets from giddy dippers celebrating their title win.

Were we as giddy last season when we were god knows how many points ahead

I reckon some were, its part of football and social media nowadays

if we do not like it we can simply log off
 
The clubs fault.

Should have strengthened properly in the summer.

Instead we stagnated yet again and have allowed Liverpool to overtake us allowing them to get all giddy.

Until the club stops putting the breaks on the moment we we win a title this shit from the media will keep happening.


I think the 19 point gap and 100 points made them think that whatever happened it wouldn’t make any difference this season. They were wrong. However if we get 90 odd points and finish 2nd then it is more the quality of Liverpool’s season than our poor one that will have decided it.
 
Hold on guys, you seriously think that you are not massive oil cheats?

Is this for real - you honestly think you have got to where you are by playing fair and that the media is out to get you?

No one cares about any trophies you win because any idiot could assemble your squad with an UNLIMITED budget.

How can a team playing by the rules have an unlimited budget, how is that possible?

Sensible replies only please.
I would be interested to know which team you support as it helps my reply.
It had to take outside money to break the cartel operating that meant the same 4 clubs from England qualified for Europe every season (with the exception of a freak season when Everton and Spurs got in).
You see the so called big four and their European counterparts in the cartel financially doped the European Cup so it became the Champions league and with a format that pretty much guaranteed 3 home games and a huge chance (via seeding) that they would all make the latter stages (= more money via home games and TV).
No one ever mentions this cartel as financially doping the game. It meant the big four got richer and the gap between the rest widened. So the big four could buy the best players (how many times did the rags break the transfer record?) and pay the most in wages.
On top of this, the big four are on TV more in the premier League than the rest so they get more TV revenue and further widen the gap. No one EVER said ''this isn't a level playing field''. The poorer clubs never complained but just got on with it.
And then Chelsea and City come along and all of a sudden fans from the rags, Liverpool and Arsenal are screaming like the spoilt brats they are ''it isn't a level playing field'' ''how can we compete with that?'' - these self serving fans see no difference between forcing UEFA to give them more money or they will form their own league and demanding more money from the premier League at the expense of others and money coming in from outside sources. One is deemed ''self earned'' the other is dirty money. These fans are like MP's fiddling the expenses whilst saying ''it is within the rules'' - yes because the rules were created by themselves to be able to still feast at the trough. Money the rags, Arsenal and Liverpool ''earned'' during the period when they were in Europe year in and year out is tainted. It was money earned whilst being able to play sides from Albania and Estonia in a tournament designed to ensure no big club was knocked out in the first round and no big club was pitted against another big club in the first 3 rounds..... but that is seen as clean money.
So as I said, the cartel / non level playing field needed smashing and the only way it could happen is via outside investment.... I don't hear fans from Fulham complaining loudly, or Watford or Burnley.... the only fans who seem to really be griped by City are the ones knocked off their guaranteed top four perch..... Liverpool, Arsenal and rags.... funny that, isn't it...
 
I would be interested to know which team you support as it helps my reply.
It had to take outside money to break the cartel operating that meant the same 4 clubs from England qualified for Europe every season (with the exception of a freak season when Everton and Spurs got in).
You see the so called big four and their European counterparts in the cartel financially doped the European Cup so it became the Champions league and with a format that pretty much guaranteed 3 home games and a huge chance (via seeding) that they would all make the latter stages (= more money via home games and TV).
No one ever mentions this cartel as financially doping the game. It meant the big four got richer and the gap between the rest widened. So the big four could buy the best players (how many times did the rags break the transfer record?) and pay the most in wages.
On top of this, the big four are on TV more in the premier League than the rest so they get more TV revenue and further widen the gap. No one EVER said ''this isn't a level playing field''. The poorer clubs never complained but just got on with it.
And then Chelsea and City come along and all of a sudden fans from the rags, Liverpool and Arsenal are screaming like the spoilt brats they are ''it isn't a level playing field'' ''how can we compete with that?'' - these self serving fans see no difference between forcing UEFA to give them more money or they will form their own league and demanding more money from the premier League at the expense of others and money coming in from outside sources. One is deemed ''self earned'' the other is dirty money. These fans are like MP's fiddling the expenses whilst saying ''it is within the rules'' - yes because the rules were created by themselves to be able to still feast at the trough. Money the rags, Arsenal and Liverpool ''earned'' during the period when they were in Europe year in and year out is tainted. It was money earned whilst being able to play sides from Albania and Estonia in a tournament designed to ensure no big club was knocked out in the first round and no big club was pitted against another big club in the first 3 rounds..... but that is seen as clean money.
So as I said, the cartel / non level playing field needed smashing and the only way it could happen is via outside investment.... I don't hear fans from Fulham complaining loudly, or Watford or Burnley.... the only fans who seem to really be griped by City are the ones knocked off their guaranteed top four perch..... Liverpool, Arsenal and rags.... funny that, isn't it...
Eloquently put Mad Eye. Judging by the lack of an inteligent response you appear to have rendered our *rag/dipper/istry boy (*delete as appropriate) "guest" somewhat speechless.
 
Keown's comments were a disgrace, as was the other commentator bringing it up when it's in no way relevant. It's so transparent, no other club gets this treatment. Don't suppose there will be a spending comparison between the dippers and Leicester during tonight's game.
 
The only real difference for me on last season is there has been more Brain farts by our players and more 'worldies' score against us. We absolutely dominated Newcastle but one of our better players decided to 'have a moment' at pivotal moment in the match.

I still believe we can win the league and for me the only reason we are second is because the dippers are having a good season but have been assisted every step of the way. If they do not win tonight it is very much still on for us to beat them to it.

They will fade at some point and tonight could be the night. We will see.
 
They certainly should be. The inference, once again, that we are somehow cheating. He likes the sound of his own voice, Keown, clearly isn't comfortable with dead air.

However, the lead commentator is equally culpable for his prepared notes, which he clearly wanted to use to cite how we had 17 players over the £20m one Newcastle have, yet can't see the hypocrisy in how often they mentioned Mike Ashley's running of the club.

Personally, we should demand a public apology from Keown and do the bare contractual minimum when it comes to BT and future coverage.

Certainly not affording them sit downs with Leroy Sane.
We won't do fuck all, soft as shite
 
who was it on bt last night that dropped a cheap shot with " city have 17 players all worth more than newcastles record signing then said its financial doping"
 
bbc reporting last night rags draw with struggling burnley at home as a "gripping comeback " solskjaer said the side's fans were treated to a "typical Old Trafford finish" as they came from 2-0 down to rescue a dramatic point against Burnley.
"The comeback was brilliant, the players have been asked about how they would react if they went 1-0 or 2-0 down so I felt the comeback was fantastic,"
ycnmiu or why am I suprised when the bbc are based in salford full of rags
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top