scousemanc
Well-Known Member
It's children not kids
Nonsense. Those who have the right to protest are those who are walking the walk. You simply cant protest about how others are living if you are living the same or worse. Ridiculous.
It's children not kids
Because they are walking around cities glued to their mobiles with earphones in, using every form of social media available, jumping in Ubers, getting lifts here there and everywhere and taking advantage of every comfort and convenience they can do, for which I don't blame them, but theres absolutely no way Ill be lectured by them until that changes
And who should vet these protesters to make sure they're 'walking the walk'?Nonsense. Those who have the right to protest are those who are walking the walk. You simply cant protest about how others are living if you are living the same or worse. Ridiculous.
It's children not kids
And who should vet these protesters to make sure they're 'walking the walk'?
Or should we just presume the worst of all of them?
Im not suggesting anyone should vet them. Im just saying they would have a tad more credibility if they did walk the walk.
It's THE hot sentence for baby boomers to circlejerk to nowadays just so that they can try to return to their ignorant pits of personal hedonism for which they dare not feel ashamed.
Ha, well neither of my kids are doing the things you mention but they are definitely concerned about the environment. Which is why it’s dangerous to make generalisations about a demographic you are seemingly out of touch with.
So they don't have phones, use computer games, get lifts in cars, use plastic, watch TV, fly on foreign holidays, eat meat, etc etc. Good on them !! Wait till they grow up.
So they don't have phones, use computer games, get lifts in cars, use plastic, watch TV, fly on foreign holidays, eat meat, etc etc. Good on them !! Wait till they grow up.
No, I never actually said that. Weird that you’re particularly offended by the under-13 demographic, but each to their own.
Which modern day accessories are they allowed to use for their protest to be valid to you?
Whats really weird is that response. But hey ho, as you say, each to their own.
Who's decided they don't?Im not suggesting anyone should vet them. Im just saying they would have a tad more credibility if they did walk the walk.
I don't think it counts unless gavvo sees the flip flops and is fully convinced that they're recycled.I don't understand why these kids are getting grief for trying to make a positive change. Because some of them got there in a car they can't protest about climate change? Are they only allowed to protest if they march in recycled flip flops?
Who's decided they don't?
No, I know fuck all about them on an individual basis so I'm trying not to make gigantic general assumptions about them.Why, do you think they do ?