Media coverage 2018/19

Status
Not open for further replies.
What they going to do while the cup finals on next week, a two hour special on the class of 1902 or highlights of Scholesys first two games at Oldham ?
 
5Live bloke on 606 basically said it is unfair that City can just go out and sign another player. Gave the example of Laporte. I think it was a take on the our money has not come the right way riff. No one mentions the media doping that some clubs get. It is unfair that coverage for all clubs is not the same. How much additional revenue do the media favourites get because they are on the telly more .We all joke about Noodle partners or official windscreen wiper partners but those businesses know that the media coverage given will be considerably more and much more positive. It is also obvious that the clubs who benefit from this media doping can strike a better deal.

When Liverpool are on 5Live it will usually be Kelly Cates running the show with an ex-Liverpool player doing the ex-pro role with the commentator. United the other day had Mark Chapman and Phil Neville. We don't get that . If we have advantages then other clubs do as well but perhaps they are not as obvious or are ignored by the media.
 
‘There was no overstating the gulf between these two clubs - Newport, with a squad value totalling £70,000, against Manchester City, the world's most richly-assembled squad at around £450m’

FFS.

It’s not even the most richly-assembled squad in Manchester.
 
sheepskin_tearaway said:
‘There was no overstating the gulf between these two clubs - Newport, with a squad value totalling £70,000, against Manchester City, the world's most richly-assembled squad at around £450m’

FFS.

It’s not even the most richly-assembled squad in Manchester.
Click to expand...
Phil Foden £0....Newport County £70,000.
 
sheepskin_tearaway said:
‘There was no overstating the gulf between these two clubs - Newport, with a squad value totalling £70,000, against Manchester City, the world's most richly-assembled squad at around £450m’

FFS.

It’s not even the most richly-assembled squad in Manchester.
Click to expand...
It is.
 
waspish said:
There’s agenda in the media to mention our spending at every oppotunity while not saying a word about other clubs spending. Its never going to end because of the bitterness of the scouser and rags plus those in the media who are sad Barst@ds who bring there bias to there work.
Click to expand...

And, unfortunately, that's exactly what keeps them in a job so best not rock the boat by bringing attributes like impartiality, objectivity nor balance to the table.
 
Reading some shite today, it makes out we were lucky to win. I'm pretty sure that if the dippers or scum had have played Newport the money difference wouldn't even have been mentioned.
 
DT King of all Geordies said:
5Live bloke on 606 basically said it is unfair that City can just go out and sign another player. Gave the example of Laporte. I think it was a take on the our money has not come the right way riff. No one mentions the media doping that some clubs get. It is unfair that coverage for all clubs is not the same. How much additional revenue do the media favourites get because they are on the telly more .We all joke about Noodle partners or official windscreen wiper partners but those businesses know that the media coverage given will be considerably more and much more positive. It is also obvious that the clubs who benefit from this media doping can strike a better deal.

When Liverpool are on 5Live it will usually be Kelly Cates running the show with an ex-Liverpool player doing the ex-pro role with the commentator. United the other day had Mark Chapman and Phil Neville. We don't get that . If we have advantages then other clubs do as well but perhaps they are not as obvious or are ignored by the media.
Click to expand...

"Media doping" ' I like that, might use it myself.
 
DT King of all Geordies said:
5Live bloke on 606 basically said it is unfair that City can just go out and sign another player. Gave the example of Laporte. I think it was a take on the our money has not come the right way riff. No one mentions the media doping that some clubs get. It is unfair that coverage for all clubs is not the same. How much additional revenue do the media favourites get because they are on the telly more .We all joke about Noodle partners or official windscreen wiper partners but those businesses know that the media coverage given will be considerably more and much more positive. It is also obvious that the clubs who benefit from this media doping can strike a better deal.

When Liverpool are on 5Live it will usually be Kelly Cates running the show with an ex-Liverpool player doing the ex-pro role with the commentator. United the other day had Mark Chapman and Phil Neville. We don't get that . If we have advantages then other clubs do as well but perhaps they are not as obvious or are ignored by the media.
Click to expand...
The Laporte whinge was pretty strange, he never mentioned how he changed his mind about United or Chelsea after their inflation busting deals and VVD to Liverpool was ok because of the magic bean money received for Coutinho. It was hardly a surprise that he told a scouse caller that his favourite cup final involved Liverpool.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top