Schalke post match thread

SWP's back said:
Because despite being a leading member of the “they fuck us over/agenda brigade” I agreed with both decisions tonight and won’t change that just because some people are losing their shit and calling me names.
Click to expand...

If you agree with the handball penalty, I would love to see us ever get a similar decision in the same competition. It simply wouldn't happen. Ever.
 
SWP's back said:
Doesn’t matter. He still has his arm there in the first place making his body larger and stops it travelling at goal.

It’s fucking immaterial now as it’s happened and I’m not sure what cathartic experience is being had by calling everything and everyone bent. I thought it was a pen, I still think it’s a pen and I will always think it’s a pen.
Click to expand...

Then why didn't we get that one on Sunday!
 
west didsblue said:
It might have helped the BT Otamendi penalty discussion if they’d played it a normal speed as well as slow motion. At normal speed it would have been much easier to judge whether he had time to move his arm out of the way. Peter Walton seemed to base his opinion on the slow motion only.
Click to expand...
About a quarter to a third of a second I reckon. Most cricket slip catches off a fast bowler are around half a second. It was harsh.
 
SWP's back said:
Doesn’t matter. He still has his arm there in the first place making his body larger and stops it travelling at goal.

It’s fucking immaterial now as it’s happened and I’m not sure what cathartic experience is being had by calling everything and everyone bent. I thought it was a pen, I still think it’s a pen and I will always think it’s a pen.
Click to expand...
Where was his arm supposed to be?
 
SWP's back said:
Because despite being a leading member of the “they fuck us over/agenda brigade” I agreed with both decisions tonight and won’t change that just because some people are losing their shit and calling me names.
Click to expand...
Can you imagine that bullshit being given against Madrid or united ?
 
Defenders hoping to make a block on a shot are supposed to throw themselves at the ball or stand in the way with their arms tucked behind their backs? What absolute horse shit!! Never a pen
 
cleavers said:
It shouldn't be up for debate at all, that is how VAR in the CL is supposed to work, it shouldn't be given from UEFA headquarters. We were being fucked over tonight when our goal went to VAR, "City have scored, so lets find a reason not to give it" took nearly 2 minutes, when it was clearly a legit goal.
Click to expand...
If that was the case then they would have disallowed our first and third goals. This conspiracy shit is getting silly now.
 
west didsblue said:
It might have helped the BT Otamendi penalty discussion if they’d played it a normal speed as well as slow motion. At normal speed it would have been much easier to judge whether he had time to move his arm out of the way. Peter Walton seemed to base his opinion on the slow motion only.
Click to expand...

And being a cnut of a referee .
 
SWP's back said:
Doesn’t matter. He still has his arm there in the first place making his body larger and stops it travelling at goal.

It’s fucking immaterial now as it’s happened and I’m not sure what cathartic experience is being had by calling everything and everyone bent. I thought it was a pen, I still think it’s a pen and I will always think it’s a pen.
Click to expand...
Ah, so there is a rule which states that defenders should have their arms by their sides or behind their backs, especially when a free kick is being taken?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top