How would City cope with a transfer ban?

It always makes me smile when I hear these wonderful lines from either so called pundits or managers who have faced City :
"They have a very large squad".
No you fucking numpties we have the same amount as the rest of the PL ... its the quality we have not the quantity.Makes my piss boil.
 
If for arguments sake we had an enduring ban on transfer then we would get to really test the ability of the academy to produce players able to step up.

What I think would happen is that we are pretty good at churning out technically good attacking midfielders & wingers and the odd CM but they tend to be box to box types and not the sort of defensive minded tackling machines that teams need. In defense we do ok for CBs but havent turned out that many right or left backs over the years. And we haven't had a decent striker come through the academy as for maybe 20 years (I'm counting Nacho as a transfer).

Genuine question - who was the last city academy striker to score more than 10 goals in a season? Was it David White?

For City you're probably right, Sturridge must have done it for Liverpool though.
 
A transfer ban could lead to City actually prioritising cup competitions.

We may see for instance a younger side in the carabou cup next season, perhaps even the FA Cup
That would be a good thing IMO
Would be ironic (for FIFA and the various other entities behind this) if the ban leads to more development for three or four of our extremely talented youngsters, leading to them earning a place in the senior squad, thus saving us significant amounts of money, and further advancing our academy (which will attract even more talented youngsters after the transfer ban)...
 
It always makes me smile when I hear these wonderful lines from either so called pundits or managers who have faced City :
"They have a very large squad".
No you fucking numpties we have the same amount as the rest of the PL ... its the quality we have not the quantity.Makes my piss boil.
This,the idiots keep repeating that every 5 mins,they don't seem to realise we have quality back up players because of planning and spending wisely,they couldn't possibly give us any credit for that
 
We have a squad of 25, never mind looking at bringing in more players. If any transfer ban happens then we deal with it.
 
i would refuse to release our players for international friendlies, if our squad cannot be added to, no way can we risk injuries in nothing games.
I would refuse to release our players even if we don't get a transfer ban.

Fu#k The FA they can't have it all their own way. Target us one minute and expect our player's to step up for international duties.

Noticed the rag players are dropping like flies.
 
I would refuse to release our players even if we don't get a transfer ban.

Fu#k The FA they can't have it all their own way. Target us one minute and expect our player's to step up for international duties.

Noticed the rag players are dropping like flies.

Completely agree

But if players aren’t available for the national team the national team can demand they don’t play the next game for their club.

Which never happens.

But if it ever did, I know who it would happen to ...
 
Would be ironic (for FIFA and the various other entities behind this) if the ban leads to more development for three or four of our extremely talented youngsters, leading to them earning a place in the senior squad, thus saving us significant amounts of money, and further advancing our academy (which will attract even more talented youngsters after the transfer ban)...
New FIFA rule "Academy Fair Play": Only 1 academy player is allowed to graduate to the senior team in any 3 year (rolling) period to prevent teams with the best academies from gaining an unfair advantage.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top