UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

[MillionMilesAway]

Was was Vincent's goal against Leicester then?

Wouldn't have gained us any extra points if it had counted double.

 

[laserblue]

You need to get a dictionary and look up the word genuine.

Anyone should be allowed to post genuine posts on any forum but your 69 posts on red cafe have confused me somewhat. I couldn’t be arsed to go through them all so I’ve picked out three

4/4/19. (About City). “Leeds,Newcastle, Everton have much bigger following and are therefore bigger clubs for me.”

28/4/19. “Fecking embarrassing all the City love in here”

23/4/19. “Nah I’m a neutral with a slight leaning towards Liverpool if I’m honest. Mostly because feck City and their bottomless pit of cash ruining the PL.”

The last post is the one that really confused me when it’s put alongside your 1st post yesterday.

You slimey little fucking turd.

Well done mate. Newport and Leeds my arse.

 

[nmc]

That's well researched .So presumably the City Lawyers could argue that down valuing the Etihad company is completely arbitrary by UEFA ( via PricewaterhouseCoopers) and if PSG have been let off the hook by CAS then why should City be penalised since PSG seem to have been in the same situation that City are now in?

Why would we agree to that. Our deal is below market value. Look at United’s inflated deal with Chevrolet - who were in receipt of state subsidies at the time that deal was negotiated or should I say botched.

 

[crystal_mais]

Biggest 2 fingers City can give - is by going all out an buying Messi - cmon then - how about no CL without Messi

 

[BlueRain]

Matt Scott (think that’s his name) on talksh*t moment ago to tell us that we’re awaiting a season long ban- not awaiting a decision on guilt or innocence, or any other possible sanctions.
He also informed us that Acas has never overturned a uefa decision.
Some mistake surely

The biggest mistake was you listening to talksh*t :) I gave up a long time ago... I somehow feel "cleaner" for it :)

 

[lancs blue]

“While Manchester City deals with repercussions of these investigations, there could be another brewing.

A little-known European Union agency called Eurojust is looking into the information released by Football Leaks with particular emphasis on “serious tax evasion, collective fraud, embezzlement, corruption and money laundering.”

Seems clear to me what the Forbes article is insinuating here . I hope city have felt their collar too.

I’d be more worried if I were a club who say. Were registered in the caymen islands for example

It's guilt by juxtaposition, throw in the sentence about tax evasion etc and then follow up with a sentence about City without actually linking the two directly. I also like how they quote a tweet by some random bitter dipper about stripping the titles.

 

[paulsimpson]

“While Manchester City deals with repercussions of these investigations, there could be another brewing.

A little-known European Union agency called Eurojust is looking into the information released by Football Leaks with particular emphasis on “serious tax evasion, collective fraud, embezzlement, corruption and money laundering.”

Seems clear to me what the Forbes article is insinuating here . I hope city have felt their collar too.

I’d be more worried if I were a club who say. Were registered in the caymen islands for example

The issue surrounding leaks cuts both ways like a double edged sword. If there is allegedly dirt on one club that is pushed in media circles then most probably there is dirt on many more . The whole leaks problem may be an opportunity for City to expose the possible endemic corruption in the elitist corridors of power in UEFA. It's like a guy digging a hole and he falls into it himself . All very well being part of a seemingly pretentious investigating chamber but it can gloriously back fire if one isn't looking at the totality of emails and information one is given i.e. scrutinising emails selectively. City Lawyers will want to look at every single hacked email if it gets to that stage of allowing such illegal info by the CAS.

 

[lancs blue]

He also informed us that Acas has never overturned a uefa decision.

Did he call them ACAS? Piss funny if he did, and CAS have set aside rulings by FIFA, UEFA and the IOC many times.

 

[Machiavelli]

You really think it was the right thing to do?

No it wasn’t

The day before, or on FA Cup Final Day, to sack the Manager, was absolute Madness.

All the club had to do was hold fire until after City won (or lost) the cup, and after the victory parade, and then later that Week after everything had settled down, they should have quietly, in-private, and with as little fuss as possible, and after negotiating terms with Mancini, sacked him.

You must be the only City who didn’t have their day ruined from the moment the sacking rumours started to gather pace around Wembley, until Wigan lifted the FA Cup.

Like many City fans I’ve witnessed numerous lows at City, and that was definitely one of them.

Anyway, back to topic.

F*** off UEFA, Gill, United, Liverpool, Arsenal, Bayern, Real Madrid, Barcelona, all the other cartel clubs and European football associations, mainly La Liga and the Bundesliga, who are trying constantly to f*** City over!

That’s two different things though
1) sacking Mancini
2) losing the final to Wigan
I’m more bothered about number 2.

 

[Indaparkside]

He did, I just made it up.


Joking, it’s the same cun.t

What a cvunt he was?? Well done pal, I bet he fucked off quicker that wio out of the bog window when you ousted him

 

[JPAMCR]

I'd guess this has been done to take the piss out of the scousers.

 

[hello]

Did he call them ACAS? Piss funny if he did, and CAS have set aside rulings by FIFA, UEFA and the IOC many times.

Maybe he really was thinking of going to ACAS once the twat has has finally been fired for masquerading as a journalist for so long.

 

[Machiavelli]

I agree with you but all the efforts are towards Punishing City, there’s not much shit flying in PSG’s direction.

They’ve already been through what we’re facing and appealed to CAS who ruled in their favour. I’m sure @Parisian will put you straight, he’s posted about it in detail several times over the last few days on this thread.

 

[paulsimpson]

Why would we agree to that. Our deal is below market value. Look at United’s inflated deal with Chevrolet - who were in receipt of state subsidies at the time that deal was negotiated or should I say botched.

We both agree . I'm saying the Uefa valuation is arbitrary which means it is based on random choice, personal whim, autocratic use of authority rather than any reason or system.
"an arbitrary decision"

 

[razman]

Class press conference by pep today

 

[MillionMilesAway]

Did he call them ACAS? Piss funny if he did, and CAS have set aside rulings by FIFA, UEFA and the IOC many times.

However, he's almost certainly correct that ACAS haven't overturned a UFA decision. Credit where it's due...

 

[razman]

Matt Scott (think that’s his name) on talksh*t moment ago to tell us that we’re awaiting a season long ban- not awaiting a decision on guilt or innocence, or any other possible sanctions.
He also informed us that Acas has never overturned a uefa decision.
Some mistake surely

He is a massive bellend

Arsenal fan

 

[Machiavelli]

This is simply as misinformed as when non City fans (with no clue) claim the same about City.

PSG need to sell now to break even and did the same last summer. Also, their sponsorship deals are indeed seen as 'related party' transactions and are tested against the "fair market value" calculation.

It’s the type of stupid ignorance that we face. Folk online talking shit about stuff they clearly know nothing about but talking as if they’re experts on the subject.
Poor @Parisian has corrected several people on here this week when they’ve said stuff about PSG and have been wrong.
They’re probably the same people who keep posting about the NTY being owned by Liverpool. ;-)

 

[laserblue]

Yeah, that's my thinking too. And it's pretty poor form of Forbes to imply that it's solely aimed at City. Evading tax is a far more serious matter than breaching some arbitrary financial rules dreamed up by a footballing governing body as Glasgow Rangers will surely testify.

It will be piss funny if certain other clubs get implicated in that kind of shit because that will be a far bigger story than City and FFP. Rochdale versus United in League 2 anyone?

Salford City v United has a better ring to it. Rochdale would probably be in a higher division anyway.

 

[paulsimpson]

Matt Scott (think that’s his name) on talksh*t moment ago to tell us that we’re awaiting a season long ban- not awaiting a decision on guilt or innocence, or any other possible sanctions.
He also informed us that Acas has never overturned a uefa decision.
Some mistake surely

I always thought that the presumption of innocence was sacrosanct within journalism but not anymore I'm afraid. They have us hung drawn and quartered before a fair trial or even a proper hearing is is announced .