Media coverage 2018/19

Status
Not open for further replies.
I know of a few who’ve cancelled for the same reason , there’s even a few on here . How any City fan would hand money to our enemies BT & Sky baffles me ...it’s like buying the mirror or Daily mail every day , just don’t understand it ....well maybe I do , we’re obsessed with football & need our football fix.

Keeping Sky for F1 Cricket and golf cannot be arsed with streams
 
The editorial/commercial issue they have is that there ends up being an even greater concentration of red team fans subscribing who they need to pander to. The print media have the same problem. So it ends up becoming ever more Liverpool/United focused and the vicious circle continues.

I did wonder about BT at the end of the season admitting they might have been unfair to City. It smacked (once I'd tracked it down) of an apology almost. We'll have to see if next year changes anything.
 
We need an expert to come on here and provide ways in which we can ditch Sky (actually paying) and still have access to the channels they have, I have to admit Sky Atlantic is good.

I use my dad’s sky password for sky go on the laptop and have a cable looped from USB port to hdmi in the tv that basically allows me to project whatever is on my laptop screen onto the tv.

I only subscribe to bt for the rugby, can’t be arsed with sky as well.
 
Apologies if this has already been discussed, as i listen to 5 live(rpool) from 4 o,clock, and then a repeat of Robbie Savage' show from yesterday. In the Liverpool wankfest discussing their Lazarusesque revival against Barcelona, i couldn't help but think about the commentary and discussion of dippers 4th goal, "how cute was he" how clever was Alexander Arnold" "so imaginative" .........................don't quite recall the same reaction when Sergio scored our "2nd" at Newcastle - disallowed because we dared to take it quickly cute? clever? imaginative? nah! just disallow it cant take it before the whistle is blown, unless you are Liverpool

As you can see that niggled me a bit, but then in Savage's show, Mark Ogden (****) and i quote "Liverpool are the best team in.................the WORLD at the moment, i know City beat them by one point in the League, and did the treble, but in a one off game, Liverpool can beat anybody" - Didn't beat us last year did they??
MOIAC
 
Apologies if this has already been discussed, as i listen to 5 live(rpool) from 4 o,clock, and then a repeat of Robbie Savage' show from yesterday. In the Liverpool wankfest discussing their Lazarusesque revival against Barcelona, i couldn't help but think about the commentary and discussion of dippers 4th goal, "how cute was he" how clever was Alexander Arnold" "so imaginative" .........................don't quite recall the same reaction when Sergio scored our "2nd" at Newcastle - disallowed because we dared to take it quickly cute? clever? imaginative? nah! just disallow it cant take it before the whistle is blown, unless you are Liverpool

As you can see that niggled me a bit, but then in Savage's show, Mark Ogden (****) and i quote "Liverpool are the best team in.................the WORLD at the moment, i know City beat them by one point in the League, and did the treble, but in a one off game, Liverpool can beat anybody" - Didn't beat us last year did they??
MOIAC
It’s gonna be like this unfortunately,if the scousers had say won the league but we were in the final against spurs having won both domestic cups they still would claim the scousers as best team in the world,if spurs win tonight it won’t be they are the better side it’ll be the scousers didn’t play to their potential or some shite like that ...
 
It’s gonna be like this unfortunately,if the scousers had say won the league but we were in the final against spurs having won both domestic cups they still would claim the scousers as best team in the world,if spurs win tonight it won’t be they are the better side it’ll be the scousers didn’t play to their potential or some shite like that ...

That's why the league title is the best barometer for deciding who is the best team.

Liverpool and Tottenham both fine sides unquestionably, who both had luck on their sides at times to get to the final.
There's lots of people (esp the media)who are desperate for Liverpool to be rewarded for their exploits this season.

Hope fate is still Liverpool's cruel mistress.
:)
 
That's why the league title is the best barometer for deciding who is the best team.

Liverpool and Tottenham both fine sides unquestionably, who both had luck on their sides at times to get to the final.
There's lots of people (esp the media)who are desperate for Liverpool to be rewarded for their exploits this season.

Hope fate is still Liverpool's cruel mistress.
:)

Fate had nothing to do with them challenging for the league.
 

Idiot.

Khaldoon was obviously talking about City never holding the European/World record transfer... Ronaldo like money which is the relevance to a La Liga rep being a hypocrite(his comprehension skills are shite for a journalist). Yes we approached Kaka but thankfully it didn't happen so what are you talking about Castles?

The Robinho transfer was only a British transfer record which broke the existing record(£30m) by £2m set 2 years earlier(Shevchenko Chelsea) Liverpool paid £3m more than that for Andy Carroll(£35m) 2 years and 4 months later but he won't mention that.

Then he goes on about individual positions:

GKs
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/tra...spielerposition_id=&altersklasse=&leihe=&w_s=
GK-Transfers.jpg

Ederson was not a world record transfer for a goalkeeper(Buffon held that from 2002) but a British one for one single season(£36m), Pickford cost Everton £25.65m in the same window. Alisson beat the world record and smashed the British one by £20m(£56m). If anything Alisson's fee made way for Kepa's by breaking it so significantly.

CBs
CB-Transfers.jpg

The increase for our CBs was not a massive leap on what came before, look at Ferdinand's fee, is that correct? Shocking if true, all the way back then...

With the sidebacks there is more of a case for we increased the record significantly but we needed quality and experience in a specialised role. Those types of players were never going to come cheap. If anyone tries to do the same they will easily break both records(lb or rb). We paid market price on both.

The argument was about inflation being blamed on the the wrong people, City have proven to have gotten much better at spending well because the teams value is worth more than what we paid for it. You can't make a case we are paying over the odds anymore, not by a long shot.

He's also referencing them as Abu Dhabi funded buys, our press become more pathetic and desperate by the day, they are cracking up.

I was waiting for a response to the interview, not surprised this is the best he could come up with because Khaldoon was measured and accurate... unlike their own work.

Has Steve Daley been used as part of his argument yet?
 
Just feel sorry for Tottenham in what is the finest night of their history and a huge achievement to possibly be Champions of Europe, spending half as much as Liverpool in the past 4 seasons, yet the media are still just tugging Klopp off 24/7 talking about 3 Euro finals in a row (how many has he won again?) and 6 times la.
 
I think Chelsea are mugs for getting rid of Sarri. His Napoli side was superb. This year the media have done everything they can to undermine Sarri, culminating in the fake news story about him losing his temper in training (since rebutted). He has been treated just like Mancini was at City. He's a bit of an eccentric and has upset some of the parasites in the sports press. Time will tell but I think appointing media darling Lampard would be a big mistake for Chelsea. Some of their fans are smart enough to know this but that's not the media narrative.
Sarri’s Napoli weren’t that good, they failed to qualify from our Champions League group and bottled it late in the season for the League. Sarri a stubborn fucker with only one way of playing and his lack of adaptability and squad rotation would mean never winning the League in England with Chelsea whilst being involved in Cup competitions. He might just miss out on the League at Juve, Inter will be splashing the cash and with Champions League football they may well attract enough quality players to challenge for the title.
 
Just feel sorry for Tottenham in what is the finest night of their history and a huge achievement to possibly be Champions of Europe, spending half as much as Liverpool in the past 4 seasons, yet the media are still just tugging Klopp off 24/7 talking about 3 Euro finals in a row (how many has he won again?) and 6 times la.
If Spurs do win we'll need to brace ourselves for a few days of back pages about our finances no doubt.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top