Whilst almost everything you say is correct, it would only be disallowed next season if the referee is shown footage of it hitting his arm. As he clearly indicated it HADN’T hit his arm, given exactly the same footage as last season, that goal will still stand next season.
Happens every year, Fantasy Football promoting usually United especially when they play their pre season friendlies.
Had a good view in the ground of it and thought it looked like handball. What did it for me though was the players reaction. There was a pause before they and the fans celebrated. They knew it was dodgy. Had the referee seen all the angles he would have given it as handball. Water under the bridge now. I think if we had gone through anyway we may not have won the league because of tiredness. Spurs certainly tailed off.
There's no difference between the Sissoko handball in the final and the Llorente handball. If the ball doesn't hit Llorente's elbow it's probably not bouncing down on his thigh and into the net. If it doesn't hit his elbow, the ball is hitting him upper thigh and would probably fall straight into the hands of Ederson.
They need to get the accolades early though, they rarely get them at the end.
Did they really?!?
BBC Sport at Mediacity have stooped to a new low.
It’s pure bias and shit like this that City and Vicky Kloss need to clamp down on. And to find out why it is continually happening at BBC Sport, Mediacity, Salford Quays.
Let’s post it again.
And they do sell advertising abroad which can appear on the web sites I believe.
Must have responded to the complaints.BBC Sport at Mediacity have stooped to a new low.
It’s pure bias and shit like this that City and Vicky Kloss need to clamp down on. And to find out why it is continually happening at BBC Sport, Mediacity, Salford Quays.
Let’s post it again.
I think I explained why that's not the right way to look at it to my mind, it's exactly like the offside rule or it should be(both attacking situations with an either or narrative). Was Aguero deliberately offside or trying to gain an advantage? He was cms offside and moved onside infact, thus gaining no advantage at all but we accept this as either he was behind the imaginary line or over it... How should the handball rule be any different for attackers either gaining an advantage from the ball hitting his arm or not? Either he gained an advantage with the arm or he didn't and he did.
My point is what if it hadn't been offside and someone had bump Erikson so he did the dodgy back pass or some infringement before that, who decides how far back we look until a decision is made about a goal ?. In one match they may check an incident and in another game overlook a very similar incident. Unless certain rules are set in stone about this injustices will still occur.