The Labour Party

He’s leading a party that was in power for 13 years, in the very recent past.

Coming narrowly 2nd to a hopeless and woeful Theresa May, who didn’t even debate, isn’t an achievement.

For crying out loud! Labour lost two elections before he became leader.
 
For crying out loud! Labour lost two elections before he became leader.
Its staggering just how thick some of the twats are on here !! Typical fodder who believe everything they see in the media , I take comfort in the fact that not everyone is a complete moron , but sometimes I seriously wonder if most actually are .
 
Part of the better than expected performance in 2017, which we didn't win, will have been down to disaffection with the Tories over Brexit. Annoyingly, Corbyn has pissed that away.
 
If you'd guessed I can't be arsed, you'd have been closer to the mark.

You see, I’ve tried to talk to you about the topic but you just won’t, as you don’t have a leg to stand on with Corbyn.

I don’t even mind that you’re Socialist, it’s just Corbyn is useless.
 
You see, I’ve tried to talk to you about the topic but you just won’t, as you don’t have a leg to stand on with Corbyn.

I don’t even mind that you’re Socialist, it’s just Corbyn is useless.

I've posted before the stats before, what Labour did from the low 20s to get to 40% was close to miraculous.

The blairites were licking their lips at the prospect of a crushing defeat, but they were sorely disappointed.

Goggle is your friend, go do the research instead of just spouting whatever pops in to your head.
 
I've posted before the stats before, what Labour did from the low 20s to get to 40% was close to miraculous.

The blairites were licking their lips at the prospect of a crushing defeat, but they were sorely disappointed.

Goggle is your friend, go do the research instead of just spouting whatever pops in to your head.

By you claiming it a success because the polls had him at 20%+ and he got to 40% in the actual election, you must believe somewhat in the accuracy of the polls. What do you think of Labour being at 18% currently then? If the polls are accurate he’s lost over 50% or his support in 2 years.

The reason he got that high was because of May’s total abomination of a campaign. It was gaining votes through default and because Corbyn’s manifesto had a wish list that was undeliverable, especially if we’re going to be worse off because of Brexit. For example wiping off student debt of students that had already left, which he later went back on after the election.

If he loses again the next time are you willing to concede he’s just not up to it?
 
By you claiming it a success because the polls had him at 20%+ and he got to 40% in the actual election, you must believe somewhat in the accuracy of the polls. What do you think of Labour being at 18% currently then? If the polls are accurate he’s lost over 50% or his support in 2 years.

The reason he got that high was because of May’s total abomination of a campaign. It was gaining votes through default and because Corbyn’s manifesto had a wish list that was undeliverable, especially if we’re going to be worse off because of Brexit. For example wiping off student debt of students that had already left, which he later went back on after the election.

If he loses again the next time are you willing to concede he’s just not up to it?

Go away and do your research.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top