B
B
blueinsa
Guest
Treaties are binding, unlike the referendum.
Do as I say, not as I do.
Treaties are binding, unlike the referendum.
Spoken like someone who has no connection to the current state of affairs regarding employment for many people.
Hours are shit, barely made 21.5 this week.
Appreciate all that
Why is that more valid than a significant majority of England voted to leave - why should England and the English voters not occasionally get some equal rights?
Its been 3 years of Scotland and Ireland - and I do mean Ireland rather than N. I.
I like the job where i'm at. Nothing I can do about the hours situation. It's dependant on many factors.I work in recruitment, maybe I can help?
With the break up of the union that's exactly what you could do. If anything, it demonstrates to me that your union is not working for all.Appreciate all that
Why is that more valid than a significant majority of England voted to leave - why should England and the English voters not occasionally get some equal rights?
Its been 3 years of Scotland and Ireland - and I do mean Ireland rather than N. I.
May organises a WA with the EU. The EU accepts the WA is the only way to leave the EU. The WA is an agreed upon and negotiated method to leave with the EU. A way to leave the EU is delivered.
The opposition and the ERG rejects it. I can understand the ERG, but why the opposition Labour MP's, SNP etc.
I like the job where i'm at. Nothing I can do about the hours situation. It's dependant on many factors.
I just have to take what becomes available. Just the way of things.
I don't disagree mate.Well when you put your faith in your elected representatives to carry out the wishes of the electorate they claim to represent and not their own interests, only to see them do the opposite, democracy, regardless of what form it takes, falls through.
Hence my comment about MP's acting in their own interests, both the ERG Tories and Labour.The SNP won’t ever, Labour did mainly because of the politics of trying to beat the Tories.
Not helped by Cameron deciding to do one after he put the question to the people first without acknowledging he had no follow up plan if the result didn't go the way he wanted it to and just relying on the rest of the party to figure it out.I don't disagree mate.
To be fair to your bunch of self serving representatives, the are not that much different to anyone else's.
I think the whole process that got you into this mess though was flawed from the beginning.
I might consider that, thank you.Ok but in all serious if you have enough just ask.
There's quite a number in England who don't feel like the union is working, that much is true. Talks of Welsh Independence, Scottish Independence, a Northern Ireland, Welsh and Scottish Parliament/Assembly but none for England, the apparent rise in anglophobia in these regions, the Scottish Referendum being as close as it was...With the break up of the union that's exactly what you could do. If anything, it demonstrates to me that your union is not working for all.
I agree that if England voted leave then they should do so.
It's not Engxit though, it's Brexit. NI is unique within the UK.
Don't disagree with any of that either MB, but there is a difference between NI/Brexit as part of the UK and also part of the GFA which like it or not involves our constitution as well as your constitution as it exists, and the reunification of Ireland. They are two entirely different matters.There's quite a number in England who don't feel like the union is working, that much is true. Talks of Welsh Independence, Scottish Independence, a Northern Ireland, Welsh and Scottish Parliament/Assembly but none for England, the apparent rise in anglophobia in these regions, the Scottish Referendum being as close as it was...
![]()
I've not felt "British" for many many years, as to a number it's become a dirty word with a abhorrent history. And with the concept of the EU, the novelty of the "United Kingdom" doesn't make any sense; a union within a union. I'm neither for nor against Irish reunification, so long as it's a decision made by the appropriate and most affected parties. At the same time though, the English have voted to leave, and if the Scottish can whine on about them not being listened to when they voted to remain, stands to reason the same should apply to the English.
I've asked the question over there several times, quite sincerely, What is British? and I've never got a satisfactory answer.The way it feels is that to be British in NI...or British in Scotland...or British in Wales involves all four nations....but being British in England is to be English
That make sense?
Hence my comment about MP's acting in their own interests, both the ERG Tories and Labour.
I read somewhere that if there were to be a border poll, there would have to be two referendums in the republic. One on the principle of unification and then a later one to agree the detail. Is that correct?Which in a nutshell shows why your form of parliamentary government was either never capable or totally ill-prepared to have this issue sorted by a referendum.
This wasn't thought through.
When we have a referendum to alter our constitution, by and large we see the text we are voting for or against.
We don't rely on parliament to decide how to do it afterwards.
May organises a WA with the EU. The EU accepts the WA is the only way to leave the EU. The WA is an agreed upon and negotiated method to leave with the EU. A way to leave the EU is delivered.
The opposition and the ERG rejects it. I can understand the ERG, but why the opposition Labour MP's, SNP etc.
It's possible. It would depend on the terms of reunification. If the 6 counties were to come in on the same terms as the existing 26 then there's already provisions in the constitution for that. If they were to have a devolved government in Belfast then that might require an all island referendum. The 6 counties would also need to ratify our constitution by referendum.I read somewhere that if there were to be a border poll, there would have to be two referendums in the republic. One on the principle of unification and then a later one to agree the detail. Is that correct?