Another new Brexit thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Without involving politics too much, the Labour party are guilty of much of this hyperbolic nonsense. Trying
to paint the state of the UK as millions living in poverty as a campaigning tool, always falls flat with the voting
populace, yet it remains one of their main ones.
I can't take Labour seriously whenever they come out with this guff. Are people struggling? Absolutely. Is homelessness a growing concern and issue? Definitely.

40% of UK children are living in "poverty"? Do me a favour.
 
See my previous reply, i am not suggesting that Brexit be stopped BECAUSE of the GFA, im stating that the GFA, ratified by the UK government following a referendum, MUST be considered and taken into account during the Brexit negotiations.

You cant just ignore or rescind the GFA because it doesnt suit Brexit....its there, its real it must be considered. I dont know the solution, but one needs found.
The solution is to can it and pretend it didn't happen. (Brexit, that is, not the GFA!)
 
L
Oh don't worry, i'm with you totally on this.

When others try and compare UK's children with those living in parts of India or South America, which is true poverty, irritates me somewhat as it highlights just how well we look after people in this country and how some choose to ignore that to score political points. I agree that there is this culture within the UK at the moment to use hyperbolic language like "poverty" to raise awareness to an issue, which becomes disingenuous and rather insulting to the hard work done to provide clean water, warm homes, safe food, for millions of people; comparative luxuries we take for granted.
The only posters that are comparing the findings from these reports to 3rd world countries are you guys. We do though seem to agree that the uk has a poverty issue that is too large compared to our developed economy. Do we also agree that even a temporary blow to the economy will take many more people into poverty? It’s one of the many conundrums I have as to why posters are happy enough to defend a no deal Brexit. Btw I am in no way apologetic about posting either of those articles despite the fact the government refuted the UN report whilst the fact checker stuff actually agrees with the governments own headline poverty numbers. The longer we fuck about with Brexit the more time these key areas are neglected.
 
Without involving politics too much, the Labour party are guilty of much of this hyperbolic nonsense. Trying
to paint the state of the UK as millions living in poverty as a campaigning tool, always falls flat with the voting
populace, yet it remains one of their main ones.

We do have a big problem with infrastructure in this country though. Travel, schools, NHS and prisons.
 
My mate at work sat 4 metres from me (and working harder than me now lol) is a Belfast born Irish passport holder. He doesn’t have a British one.
Well, is he a Dipper or a Rag?
Whichever, just put some black boot polish on his phone receiver:)
 
Remain isn’t more likely to make Scotland leave the UK is it? When we were set to stay in the EU they voted to stay, now we’re set to leave, they want to go.

How is this simple fact not registering?
I am guessing, but is he not alluding to Scotland facing a similar border and customs issue to Ireland should an independent Scotland seek to rejoin the EU?
 
I can't take Labour seriously whenever they come out with this guff. Are people struggling? Absolutely. Is homelessness a growing concern and issue? Definitely.

40% of UK children are living in "poverty"? Do me a favour.

As per Full Fact.org and based on 2016/17 figures. They give a figure of 33%. It wouldn't be surprising if it's nudged closer to 40% in the past three years.
  • An estimated 14.2 million people in a family in poverty in the UK
  • 8.4 million are working-age adults, 4.5 million are children, and 1.4 million are of pension age
  • Around 22% of the public are in poverty, and nearly 33% of children

A more in depth description of how poverty is defined for the purposes of those statistics is here: https://fullfact.org/economy/poverty-uk-guide-facts-and-figures/
 
As per Full Fact.org and based on 2016/17 figures. They give a figure of 33%. It wouldn't be surprising if it's nudged closer to 40% in the past three years.
  • An estimated 14.2 million people in a family in poverty in the UK
  • 8.4 million are working-age adults, 4.5 million are children, and 1.4 million are of pension age
  • Around 22% of the public are in poverty, and nearly 33% of children

A more in depth description of how poverty is defined for the purposes of those statistics is here: https://fullfact.org/economy/poverty-uk-guide-facts-and-figures/

I think the argument is the definition of what poverty is.
 
As per Full Fact.org and based on 2016/17 figures. They give a figure of 33%. It wouldn't be surprising if it's nudged closer to 40% in the past three years.
  • An estimated 14.2 million people in a family in poverty in the UK
  • 8.4 million are working-age adults, 4.5 million are children, and 1.4 million are of pension age
  • Around 22% of the public are in poverty, and nearly 33% of children

A more in depth description of how poverty is defined for the purposes of those statistics is here: https://fullfact.org/economy/poverty-uk-guide-facts-and-figures/
I tried mate. The 40% is a 2021 projection by the UN envoy for poverty. But he knows fa seemingly.
 
Some trade news for what it’s worth. The U.K. used to be Germany’s third biggest trade partner a few years back and this year has slipped to seventh behind Poland.
 
I am guessing, but is he not alluding to Scotland facing a similar border and customs issue to Ireland should an independent Scotland seek to rejoin the EU?

Well they would do yes but he said Scotland was more likely to leave the UK if we had remained.
 
Remain isn’t more likely to make Scotland leave the UK is it? When we were set to stay in the EU they voted to stay, now we’re set to leave, they want to go.

How is this simple fact not registering?
You not able to think it through?

Give it a try

And read the exact thing I said
 
Well they would do yes but he said Scotland was more likely to leave the UK if we had remained.
No, I don't get that either. Given a significant element of the 'no' campaign in the first referendum was 'vote no to remain in the uk' and many Scots voted no because of that single factor, I don't know where he is coming from.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top