SebastianBlue
President, International Julian Alvarez Fan Club
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 51,741
Yeah, but that’s so [galactic] basic.No, Aurebesh.
Yeah, but that’s so [galactic] basic.No, Aurebesh.
So many goals so little VAR,our are checked for mm's everyone elses are not
Those curries are killers, aren't they?Chelsea better sort out their defence. Need them to keep the rags out of top four. I can’t trust the arse.
All goals are reviewed but if there is no 'clear and obvious error' then they stand. That is the rule stated there. Unfortunately that same rule has been ignored in our case. Neither of those two goals we had removed could have remotely been 'clear and obvious errors'.
Killer Curries, the long lost horror epic from George A. Romero.Those curries are killers, aren't they?
Someone needs to plant some dodgy porn on his computer so that he can only ever get a job with the BBC in future.Favourite to replace Reilly as head of PiGMOL.
Says it all.
Chelsea look so open at the back, every goal they concede dampens the United hysteria over their result against them at least. Kante and rudiger should help but I’m not sure it fixes them. Jorginho continues to look hopeless, were so fortunate he bailed on us. that counter he tried to halt reminded me of gareth Barry’s iron boots show for England against Germany. Maybe they’re not playing to his strengths but Abraham just offers nothing as the focal point.
They really need to scrap that motto quickly. The wording is atrocious and It does nobody any favours. Clear and obvious where var is concerned doesn’t literally mean if it’s an immediately visible mistake, it simply covers non-judgement calls. did it touch his hand or not, is he offside or not regardless of by how much, was it inside the box or out etc. For our two chalked off goals it was a clear and obvious error in that the decisions were a matter of fact, it touched laportes hand prior to the goal, and sterling was offside. however harsh they may seem, they were factual calls and not judgement calls such as whether a tackle is worthy of a penalty, or red card or not.
By the laws set by the governing body the gabby goal should have stood,it is still not clear whose arm it touched or both,he had a no time gained control of the ball and set up a goal scoring opp,raz was mm's,it was never meant to be that anal,they wanted to show off the technology,don't make wrong excuses for themChelsea look so open at the back, every goal they concede dampens the United hysteria over their result against them at least. Kante and rudiger should help but I’m not sure it fixes them. Jorginho continues to look hopeless, were so fortunate he bailed on us. that counter he tried to halt reminded me of gareth Barry’s iron boots show for England against Germany. Maybe they’re not playing to his strengths but Abraham just offers nothing as the focal point.
They really need to scrap that motto quickly. The wording is atrocious and It does nobody any favours. Clear and obvious where var is concerned doesn’t literally mean if it’s an immediately visible mistake, it simply covers non-judgement calls. did it touch his hand or not, is he offside or not regardless of by how much, was it inside the box or out etc. For our two chalked off goals it was a clear and obvious error in that the decisions were a matter of fact, it touched laportes hand prior to the goal, and sterling was offside. however harsh they may seem, they were factual calls and not judgement calls such as whether a tackle is worthy of a penalty, or red card or not.
They have been absolutely desperate for him to score.NBC commentary team are distraught. They were so looking forward to the Pulisic love-in. He should have done much better there.