Premier League Games 23/24/25 August

Chelsea look so open at the back, every goal they concede dampens the United hysteria over their result against them at least. Kante and rudiger should help but I’m not sure it fixes them. Jorginho continues to look hopeless, were so fortunate he bailed on us. that counter he tried to halt reminded me of gareth Barry’s iron boots show for England against Germany. Maybe they’re not playing to his strengths but Abraham just offers nothing as the focal point.

All goals are reviewed but if there is no 'clear and obvious error' then they stand. That is the rule stated there. Unfortunately that same rule has been ignored in our case. Neither of those two goals we had removed could have remotely been 'clear and obvious errors'.

They really need to scrap that motto quickly. The wording is atrocious and It does nobody any favours. Clear and obvious where var is concerned doesn’t literally mean if it’s an immediately visible mistake, it simply covers non-judgement calls. did it touch his hand or not, is he offside or not regardless of by how much, was it inside the box or out etc. For our two chalked off goals it was a clear and obvious error in that the decisions were a matter of fact, it touched laportes hand prior to the goal, and sterling was offside. however harsh they may seem, they were factual calls and not judgement calls such as whether a tackle is worthy of a penalty, or red card or not.
 
NBC commentary team are distraught. They were so looking forward to the Pulisic love-in. He should have done much better there.
 
Favourite to replace Reilly as head of PiGMOL.

Says it all.
Someone needs to plant some dodgy porn on his computer so that he can only ever get a job with the BBC in future.

EDIT:- or Talksport.
 
Last edited:
Chelsea look so open at the back, every goal they concede dampens the United hysteria over their result against them at least. Kante and rudiger should help but I’m not sure it fixes them. Jorginho continues to look hopeless, were so fortunate he bailed on us. that counter he tried to halt reminded me of gareth Barry’s iron boots show for England against Germany. Maybe they’re not playing to his strengths but Abraham just offers nothing as the focal point.



They really need to scrap that motto quickly. The wording is atrocious and It does nobody any favours. Clear and obvious where var is concerned doesn’t literally mean if it’s an immediately visible mistake, it simply covers non-judgement calls. did it touch his hand or not, is he offside or not regardless of by how much, was it inside the box or out etc. For our two chalked off goals it was a clear and obvious error in that the decisions were a matter of fact, it touched laportes hand prior to the goal, and sterling was offside. however harsh they may seem, they were factual calls and not judgement calls such as whether a tackle is worthy of a penalty, or red card or not.

I quote the rule there. In the same way as we disagree with the ‘handball’ rule. As you infer it is what it is and we should live with. OK then so ‘clear and obvious’ is their rule not mine or yours and until it is changed it should be used.
 
Chelsea look so open at the back, every goal they concede dampens the United hysteria over their result against them at least. Kante and rudiger should help but I’m not sure it fixes them. Jorginho continues to look hopeless, were so fortunate he bailed on us. that counter he tried to halt reminded me of gareth Barry’s iron boots show for England against Germany. Maybe they’re not playing to his strengths but Abraham just offers nothing as the focal point.



They really need to scrap that motto quickly. The wording is atrocious and It does nobody any favours. Clear and obvious where var is concerned doesn’t literally mean if it’s an immediately visible mistake, it simply covers non-judgement calls. did it touch his hand or not, is he offside or not regardless of by how much, was it inside the box or out etc. For our two chalked off goals it was a clear and obvious error in that the decisions were a matter of fact, it touched laportes hand prior to the goal, and sterling was offside. however harsh they may seem, they were factual calls and not judgement calls such as whether a tackle is worthy of a penalty, or red card or not.
By the laws set by the governing body the gabby goal should have stood,it is still not clear whose arm it touched or both,he had a no time gained control of the ball and set up a goal scoring opp,raz was mm's,it was never meant to be that anal,they wanted to show off the technology,don't make wrong excuses for them
 
NBC commentary team are distraught. They were so looking forward to the Pulisic love-in. He should have done much better there.
They have been absolutely desperate for him to score.

Not NBCSN, but did you hear the American broadcasting team when he scored in the Super Cup, only for it to be chalked off for offside?

They literally went from very prominent ecstasy to the doldrums of despair in a matter of seconds. It took the commentators 10 minutes to shake the disappointment. And you know some producer had to call back the video editor to tell him not to bother putting the goal angles compilation together for worldwide airing later that evening.

They need their phenom cash cow (that they can then destroy for more profit).
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.