Or if he improves sufficiently make him cheaper to buy back.So 1m assuming he becomes a first team regular. The sell on clause very may well make us more than the original fee.
Over who? There was no chance for him to get games any time soon. Should be a decent move for him.
Permanent deal.
Thought he looked a decent player whenever I've seen him. Maybe City see Dionkou as the better prospect.
I think him signing for Celtic says quite a bit, as there's teams in the Bundesliga, Italy, France, perhaps even Spain, that he would improve if those teams had looked at him, and thought him talented enough, but he's gone to Scotland, yes their best team, but in a poor league. The fee is next to nothing (as I expect his wage will be), we can hope he improves enough to become PL level, and earn us something from the 30% sell on. Hopefully he'll get to play plenty of games, we'll see.
Hopefully, but anyone signing in that league is taking a risk, it doesn't look very ambitious does it ?Hopefully he will play a bit but I dont think he will be first choice. Could well be just a stepping stone though. Gets some first team games, prove you have what it takes and get the real clubs interested.
Hopefully, but anyone signing in that league is taking a risk, it doesn't look very ambitious does it ?
Permanent deal.
Thought he looked a decent player whenever I've seen him. Maybe City see Dionkou as the better prospect.
i would be amazed if that were the case
The Dionkou bit. No way he is a better prospect imoWhich bit? The permanent deal or the Dionkou bit?