I've got a theory that George is actually a character from Chris Morris's new film. Time will tell if I'm correct.Daily random bollocks from George.
I've got a theory that George is actually a character from Chris Morris's new film. Time will tell if I'm correct.Daily random bollocks from George.
@west didsblue in a box of his own (almost)Daily random bollocks from George.
This is totally untrue.
All three judges found that prorogation was unlawful as it was an attempt to prevent parliamentary scrutiny
http://www.scotland-judiciary.org.uk/9/2261/Joanna-Cherry-QC-MP-and-others-for-Judicial-Review
How does that work when there's only 650 MPs, or are you rounding it up to the nearest number? ;-)Correct. It's actually 99.9%
Not Arsed 99% of Mp’s are in it for 2 things to be noticed and to fill there Bank accounts as quickly as possible! Like I say they are a bunch of disingenuous Self serving K@NTS.
Project fear! I suppose you want us all to live in a nanny state where we subject children to actual propoganda campaigns telling them they need to look both ways when we cross the roads!Leadsom on the government's not publishing Yellowhammer:
I actually do not think that it serves people well to see what is the absolutely worst thing that could happen. The worst thing that could happen to me is I could walk out of here and get run over. It is not a prediction, but it is something that could happen. And simply putting out there all of the possible permutations of what could happen actually just serves to concern people.
@west didsblue in a box of his own (almost)
Again.Daily random bollocks from George.
Apparently if this is upheld in the courts in uk the earliest they will come back is 7th October because of there conferences.
Project fear! I suppose you want us all to live in a nanny state where we subject children to actual propoganda campaigns telling them they need to look both ways when we cross the roads!
How does that work when there's only 650 MPs, or are you rounding it up to the nearest number? ;-)
Apparently the ruling means that there is nothing to stop MPs returning to parliament pending the appeal. Will they turn up tomorrow?
Not at all, your speciality abusive, zero content smearing - although recognised by most as pathetic attention seeking - is classic disinformation.Daily random bollocks from George.
Does saying it was unlawful mean the Commission proroguing parliament was of no effect? Doing something unlawful doesn't necessarily mean the result is set aside.Apparently the ruling means that there is nothing to stop MPs returning to parliament pending the appeal. Will they turn up tomorrow?