In crickets they use technology that is supposed to predict how the ball would have travelled if it had not hit the pads. Technology that is supposed to detect the faintest of contact between bat and ball and which occasionally comes up with some dubious results. And they have umpires call which is basically an acceptance that system isn’t 100% accurate. And everyone seems to be happy with it! Because it’s more accurate than human beings.
I suppose the main difference is that they use it purely to establish matters of fact. Whereas football is requiring judgement calls to be made by a bloke in a studio. So in cricket it’s accepted that the technology has significantly reduced the impact of biased umpires whereas in football it’s raised suspicions of impartiality