kaz7
Well-Known Member
What did you think? was the var view on the screen clear and obvious?As far as I'm concerned I have only seen one angle, the one from the main, west stand.
What did you think? was the var view on the screen clear and obvious?As far as I'm concerned I have only seen one angle, the one from the main, west stand.
That's when they will change it, due to public opinion.I won't believe this shit isn't bent until I see littlewoods fc get a winner chalked off or a penalty ignored at klanfield, same goes for the rags at that Trafford shit hole.
Yup . You’re not the only one .The more I see it the more I think its hits shoulder.....
I read the prem have gone their own way with some of the rulesIt is worth pointing out that this rule has been brought in globally by the International Football Association Board (Ifab), and is merely being executed by the Premier League.
Which means its optional to use as long as FIFA are aware that your Federation will be implementing this rule.ITS NOT CAST IN STONE WORLDWIDE !!
I know it's also funny how TV seem to show and highlight what and which angle replays are shown at certain games.This is what we need to see,i can assure you it won't hapen,the dippers have scored 6 goals and not one of them has been under the microscope,the team with 15ish offside goals last season hmm
No it doesn`t !! I can outstretch my arms only 6 inches away from my body and they`re still outstretched.
I`ve told this thread to look at the clear photo on the back of todays Sunday Mirror.YOU INCLUDED.
The Mirror is Fucking crap .
Amended for you.
We were too busy wondering what was going on that I didnt see the replay on the stadium screen. If you had asked me I didnt think it was shown in the stadium. I thought the delay was because he had blown for the tug, stopping play, and they were going to award a penalty.What did you think? was the var view on the screen clear and obvious?
I just have...you re just choosing to disagree with it....
So again, the ball hits the player on the arm...you can see the change in direct of the ball at 52-53 seconds on the video that someone else posted....you can see that Laporte (his body and arm etc) are slightly infront of the defender (Skipp) therefore the ball hits laprotes arm (not his head as you can see that on the video)
You can choose to deny it all you want as Im sure you will do...
I for one wish it had been a goal..I jumped around like crazy when it went it and was totally deflated when i saw the replay.....but the decision was corret and most commentators say the same thing....the decision was extremely harsh but correct BUT THE LAW NEEDS CHANGIND WHNE IT COMES TO COMPLETE ACCIDENTAL HANDBALL which this was.