The Conservative Party

gordondaviesmoustache said:
It’s a perfectly analogous point to an utterly ridiculous comment in a tweet. Do you know anything about the circumstances around the death of the disabled person?

So far from deflecting, I am identifying the moronic content in the tweet you elected to post, which like much content on that medium, provides no context whatsoever.
Click to expand...

Don’t waste your breath mate.

They want echo chambers, let them have them.
 
It's good to know Tory politicians can deal with large sums of money without getting confused.

  • Transport secretary Grant Shapps confirms that the repatriation of Thomas Cook customers - known as Operation Matterhorn - will cost the taxpayer around £100m.

    He tells the BBC's Today programme: "We know that the Monarch rescue was about £50m. We know that this is about 50% bigger."

 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
By that token, the death of half a million Iraqis ‘is on’ everybody who voted Labour in 2001, which includes myself.
Click to expand...
I think that is a fair assumption. I wish I had never voted for Blair and those deaths are ultimately the responsibility of everyone who put him into power so he could lie to the country and be the Bush poodle.
 
mat said:
Watching it now.

The glee in the **** suggesting parliament is shut down. Hope the supreme court judges are watching.
Click to expand...

You see what is really dictating government policy. What is really running your country.
These people still are of the mindset that they are privileged and the only ones who should rule.
We know this, but it's still shocking to see it so open amongst themselves.
 
So this woman Johnson has been shagging and bunged £125,000 whilst doing so. Is that the going rate to shag Johnson because I can’t help feeling if she did him for 125k then negotiations with the EU are going to be a lot more expensive then the Govt is letting on.
 
lancs blue said:
It's good to know Tory politicians can deal with large sums of money without getting confused.

  • Transport secretary Grant Shapps confirms that the repatriation of Thomas Cook customers - known as Operation Matterhorn - will cost the taxpayer around £100m.

    He tells the BBC's Today programme: "We know that the Monarch rescue was about £50m. We know that this is about 50% bigger."
Click to expand...

Oh dear old Mr Green maths never was his strong subject Thomas Cook is twice the size Monach.
 
Rascal said:
I think that is a fair assumption. I wish I had never voted for Blair and those deaths are ultimately the responsibility of everyone who put him into power so he could lie to the country and be the Bush poodle.
Click to expand...

Can't agree with that mate. Nobody knew when voting for Labour and Blair in 2001 - I was one who did btw - that 2 years later we'd be invading Iraq. Much of that war was down to Bush and his "War on Terror" which came into being after 9/11, which itself happened around 4 months after the 2001 general election. You'd need a crystal ball to predict all that was going to happen when casting your vote in May 2001!
 
Len Rum said:
Anyone else thinks she looks like Stormy Daniels?
Click to expand...

I see your point she looks a bit rough, but it doesn't help when you're installing a pole dancers pole in your flat and letting someone take pictures of you on it.

What a complete Bonehead using taxpayers money to help out his bit of stuff.

This might be the first and I won't be the last that we will hear about Johnson spaffing public money away for his own personal gains.
 
Mike D said:
For now but the EU also has to agree to an extension for it now to happen its not certain do you not get that?
Click to expand...
The EU will not refuse an extension, to quote Juncker ‘no deal is catastrophic for both sides’. Macron is just being French, he won’t veto an extension.
 
hgblue said:
The EU will not refuse an extension, to quote Juncker ‘no deal is catastrophic for both sides’. Macron is just being French, he won’t veto an extension.
Click to expand...
Nothing is certain until it is signed on the dotted line and the way that Johnson is behaving nothing would surprise me.
 
M18CTID said:
Can't agree with that mate. Nobody knew when voting for Labour and Blair in 2001 - I was one who did btw - that 2 years later we'd be invading Iraq. Much of that war was down to Bush and his "War on Terror" which came into being after 9/11, which itself happened around 4 months after the 2001 general election. You'd need a crystal ball to predict all that was going to happen when casting your vote in May 2001!
Click to expand...

That's a fair point.
 
mancity2012_eamo said:
Is it not true, that the greatest achievement of the Tory government in Britain is convincing working class people that the poor are the problem and taxing them further, not the rich, is the answer?
Click to expand...
No, the argument that taxing people less, allowing entrepreneurs who take risks to create and grow businesses, to benefit from that risk taking by creating a low tax, low regulation economy, benefits the poor because these people create jobs and contribute greatly to the wealth of the nation, which in turn creates income for the government to invest in vital public services.
As opposed to the politics of envy, raising taxes which discourages entrepreneurship, reduces growth, kills jobs and badly impacts the least well off, as jobs and opportunities are denied to them.
This isn’t a battle of good versus evil, it’s a battle between those who want to increase the country’s wealth in order to improve the plight of the poor, and those who want to stifle the human desire to better their circumstances and those of their children, and in the process stifle the ability the help the less well off in society.
 
hgblue said:
No, the argument that taxing people less, allowing entrepreneurs who take risks to create and grow businesses, to benefit from that risk taking by creating a low tax, low regulation economy, benefits the poor because these people create jobs and contribute greatly to the wealth of the nation, which in turn creates income for the government to invest in vital public services.
As opposed to the politics of envy, raising taxes which discourages entrepreneurship, reduces growth, kills jobs and badly impacts the least well off, as jobs and opportunities are denied to them.
This isn’t a battle of good versus evil, it’s a battle between those who want to increase the country’s wealth in order to improve the plight of the poor, and those who want to stifle the human desire to better their circumstances and those of their children, and in the process stifle the ability the help the less well off in society.
Click to expand...

You bought the full package I see.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top