UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
Blatter was also cute enough never to have sent an email or had a mobile phone. Knowing that Qatar would win the 2022 World Cup anyway he voted for the USA so he could absolve himself of any connection with or bias towards Qatar.
A £ 100 million in 10 years they said, yet they never got a penny back? `the enemy of my enemy` Platini while PSG are around is going to be off great use to us
 
I wonder if the Times article re the Dippers hacking City is the start of City fighting back - it’s interesting that this has surfaced now but also its being reported by someone who is a fanatical Liverpool fan. Have City taken a few people to one side and given them a glimpse of reality.
 
I wonder if the Times article re the Dippers hacking City is the start of City fighting back - it’s interesting that this has surfaced now but also its being reported by someone who is a fanatical Liverpool fan. Have City taken a few people to one side and given them a glimpse of reality.
Would be great if we have, however in reality probably just a coincidence!! We are in need of sorting one or two out though
 
Would be great if we have, however in reality probably just a coincidence!! We are in need of sorting one or two out though
Reading between the lines of Khaldoon's words, like "we know when ppl say things about us", "we have the best lawyers" etc I think City are playing the long game. I would hate to be in the way when he unleashes the dogs.
 
Reading between the lines of Khaldoon's words, like "we know when ppl say things about us", "we have the best lawyers" etc I think City are playing the long game. I would hate to be in the way when he unleashes the dogs.

I totally agree, I honestly think that our owners are fully aware of what the 'other' clubs who have lobbied UEFA and those at UEFA who are attached to those other clubs are trying to achieve

If it goes the way where the sanction is unjust - the gloves will be off and then the charade will be exposed for what it is
 
Has anyone heard or read anywhere that Barcalona are in danger of breaking FFP rules. I can not remember where I read it, that If they don't make at least £100m in player sales in January, they will be breaking FFP rules.
 
Has anyone heard or read anywhere that Barcalona are in danger of breaking FFP rules. I can not remember where I read it, that If they don't make at least £100m in player sales in January, they will be breaking FFP rules.
Dembele to United, in that context now sounds plausible.
 
Old news but it keeps cropping up and I just wanted to know if I have it right in my thoughts about it:

https://sponsorship.sportbusiness.c...of-etihads-sponsorship-fee-leaked-files-show/
Sources at Der Spiegel claim to have seen a leaked email from 2015, in which City’s then-chief financial officer Jorge Chumillas informs club director Simon Pearce of ADUG’s contribution.

The email reportedly states: “Please note that out of those 67.5m pounds, 8m pounds should be funded directly by Etihad and 59.5 by ADUG [sic].”

My understanding is that this is incorrect, that ADUG were not mentioned at all in the emails, that this is where City say things have been taken out of context and misrepresented.

As an aside our deal with Etihad is worth £45m a season over 10 years and that remains unchanged but we can ask for extra one year and take less the next, to give us more wiggle room for transfers/FFP.
https://www.fourfourtwo.com/feature...b-man-utd-arsenal-liverpool-chelsea-tottenham
 
Last edited:
Old news but it keeps cropping up and I just wanted to know if I have it right in my thoughts about it:

https://sponsorship.sportbusiness.c...of-etihads-sponsorship-fee-leaked-files-show/


My understanding is that this is incorrect, that ADUG were not mentioned at all in the emails, that this is where City say things have been taken out of context and misrepresented.

As an aside our deal with Etihad is worth £45m a season over 10 years and that remains unchanged but we can ask for an extra one year and take less the next, to give us more wiggle room for transfers/FFP.
https://www.fourfourtwo.com/feature...b-man-utd-arsenal-liverpool-chelsea-tottenham
'His Highness' according to DS, not ADUG so they've (presumably) deliberately changed that.

https://www.spiegel.de/internationa...-rules-to-the-tune-of-millions-a-1236346.html
 
Thanks. Thought as much and His Highness could be a number of people who are connected to Etihad, where of course Sheikh Mansour is not.
If I remember rightly, according to forum members who do or have lived or worked over in AD, 'His Highness' relates to the Emir only, a mistake someone like Simon Pearce would not apparently make.
 
Although my question isn't directly about the UEFA investigation I think this is the most suitable active thread for it.

Pep has said several times recently that we can't afford to buy any new players and seemingly yesterday he actually said we have 'no money' to buy anyone in January. After two relatively modest net spends last summer and this one I was under the impression that we could go big again if we wanted / needed to. Obviously it's not all about net spend but I would have thought player amortisation & wages were not a huge constraint so what is the current position regarding our finances for incomings?
 
Although my question isn't directly about the UEFA investigation I think this is the most suitable active thread for it.

Pep has said several times recently that we can't afford to buy any new players and seemingly yesterday he actually said we have 'no money' to buy anyone in January. After two relatively modest net spends last summer and this one I was under the impression that we could go big again if we wanted / needed to. Obviously it's not all about net spend but I would have thought player amortisation & wages were not a huge constraint so what is the current position regarding our finances for incomings?
What Pep says about that subject always needs to be understood in a tactical context - just part of the transfer game.
 
What Pep says about that subject always needs to be understood in a tactical context - just part of the transfer game.

I agree there is an element of tactics for public consumption but my question is more about what people think about what we can or cannot do in the transfer market.

I think we have been very careful in the last windows but for what reason? FFP constraints or building up a huge war chest?
 
Although my question isn't directly about the UEFA investigation I think this is the most suitable active thread for it.

Pep has said several times recently that we can't afford to buy any new players and seemingly yesterday he actually said we have 'no money' to buy anyone in January. After two relatively modest net spends last summer and this one I was under the impression that we could go big again if we wanted / needed to. Obviously it's not all about net spend but I would have thought player amortisation & wages were not a huge constraint so what is the current position regarding our finances for incomings?
That might just be so that clubs we want to buy from don’t think we have a load of money to spend so start their negotiations £15m higher than they should for the player we want.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top