These accusations of hypocrisy are pathetic. Johnson is a proven serial liar. I dislike Corbyn intensely but there is absolutely no comparison when comparing their honesty.I just find it rather amusing the outrage and indignation about a man with whom you just happen to have completely opposing political view, who also happens to have an approval rating that trounces that of Corbyn. And who leads a party which is >10 points ahead in every poll.
I'm sure it sticks in the craw plenty.
Of course if the tables were turned, you'd be equality indignant about Corbyn and some alleged transgressions, of course you would.
I have more faith in the unanimous opinion of 11 senior judges with centuries of combined experience and knowledge of British law than I do in the pronouncements of a proven serial liar.He's absolutely right and had very good reasons to complain. It was indeed a "revolutionary" judgment converting convention into common law and prescribing new limits of a pregogative power. More importantly the opposition parties invited the courts in to politically supervise the executive by cynically abdicating their own constitutional obligation to allow a GE.
I just find it rather amusing the outrage and indignation about a man with whom you just happen to have completely opposing political view, who also happens to have an approval rating that trounces that of Corbyn. And who leads a party which is >10 points ahead in every poll.
I'm sure it sticks in the craw plenty.
Of course if the tables were turned, you'd be equality indignant about Corbyn and some alleged transgressions, of course you would.
The Liar's sister with the truth.
Well that’s bullshit.
Hedge funds don’t do naked shorts.
But they do speculate on forex markets which was what was suggested. The vehicle for the speculation was not specified and it’s just you suggesting that naked shorting is involved.Well that’s bullshit.
Hedge funds don’t do naked shorts.
You bitter sod. Just because you worked 34 years for a small garden (I've been doing same for 37 years by the way for my 40 ft garden on the housing estate I live on), why on earth are you so resentful of others who managed to get a more highly paid job? A job which you could have got if you were clever enough, hard-working enough, tenacious enough or lucky enough.
Why are you not so bitter about Sergio Aguero, but you are bitter about fund managers? When were you last moaning about how much David Silva earns?
Serious question.
Are you also bitter about not being a company director on £300k a year? Do you hate them as well?
You need an app, mailshite to truth works.I truly have no idea what you are talking about in fairness.
The man is an absolute piece of shit. I'm finding it difficult to watch the news at the moment due to my complete disgust at this man's behaviour.No personal interest - acted with complete propriety - bollocks
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...iends-having-sexual-affair-Boris-Johnson.html
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10027713/boris-johnson-jennifer-arcuri-sexual-affair/
That's why you're fucked.I feel like Michael Oliver refereeing a City game here - but this is just a cynical piece of political opportunism which certainly won't get past the police referral - misconduct in public office for a serving PM is about as likely as impeachment.
We all are in the final analysis but there are more sensitive ways of expressing that undeniable fact. Do explain your pronouncement in terms of my connection to the fate of BoJo or indeed that of Jezzer though.That's why you're fucked.
Misconduct in public office isn't a problem for a PM? Do I need to explain it?We all are in the final analysis but do explain that statement in terms of my connection to the fate of BoJo or indeed that of Jezzer.
It would be if he was convicted but that seems highly unlikely given the present circumstances - a politically motivated referall after a 6 year delay and the enquiry outcome not likely for months in any case. So yes please explain why you think it's a problem for BoJo now - he's categorically denied any wrongdoing so whether you or anyone else believe him is irrelevant until after the investigation - presumption of innocence is a legal principle you may recall? In any case, I repeat, what have I got to do with it?Misconduct in public office isn't a problem for a PM? Do I need to explain it?
How many times do you lot need to be told? There can be a GE as soon as the law that was passed by parliament blocking no deal has been enacted. Until then, because Johnson is a lying piece of shit and does not have the trust of parliament (even from members of his own party), we have to wait.He's absolutely right and had very good reasons to complain. It was indeed a "revolutionary" judgment converting convention into common law and prescribing new limits of a pregogative power. More importantly the opposition parties invited the courts in to politically supervise the executive by cynically abdicating their own constitutional obligation to allow a GE.
Generally, this past week seems to have bought out into the open some pretty disturbing attitudes and views of some on hereThe real issue is they sadly see it as a way of stopping Conservative PM's is so much Eton etc is seen as a breeding ground so get rid of the breeding ground and we can get rid of our enemy.
Its actually sinister as well as deluded as a policy.
It would be if he was convicted but that seems highly unlikely given the present circumstances - a politically motivated referall after a 6 year delay and the enquiry outcome not likely for months in any case. So yes please explain why you think it's a problem for BoJo now - he's categorically denied any wrongdoing so whether you or anyone else believe him is irrelevant until after the investigation - presumption of innocence is a legal principle you may recall? In any case, I repeat, what have I got to do with it?
It also shows he has no morals and does whatever he wants. The man is not fit for the office of PM.I think the FACT - ( for it is a proven one ) - that he seems to be almost incapable of meeting a woman without wanting to fuck her - regardless of his ( of her ) marital status is a huge issue for a PM. It makes him a massive security risk for starters - probably the easiest honeytrap in history.
Presumption of innocence is a given, but if the investigation shows wrongdoing it should be a huge problem for him regardless of the position he holds, if that isn't the reality then you're truly a basket case of a country.It would be if he was convicted but that seems highly unlikely given the present circumstances - a politically motivated referall after a 6 year delay and the enquiry outcome not likely for months in any case. So yes please explain why you think it's a problem for BoJo now - he's categorically denied any wrongdoing so whether you or anyone else believe him is irrelevant until after the investigation - presumption of innocence is a legal principle you may recall? In any case, I repeat, what have I got to do with it?
So the odds on VoC due next week couldn't have happened before Parliament was prorogued? The delay was purely motivated by a Labour cabal tactic to cause further chaos and polarization by strengthening Farage. They know they are going to lose heavily whenever a GE happens but will get a future advantage in the constititional changes left behind after involving the courts.How many times do you lot need to be told? There can be a GE as soon as the law that was passed by parliament blocking no deal has been enacted. Until then, because Johnson is a lying piece of shit and does not have the trust of parliament (even from members of his own party), we have to wait.
He'll get his vote of no confidence when he requests and accepts the extension mandated by the Benn act. If he was that desperate for an election he'd get it over and done with.So the odds on VoC due next week couldn't have happened before Parliament was prorogued? The delay was purely motivated by a Labour cabal tactic to cause further chaos and polarization by strengthening Farage. They know they are going to lose heavily whenever a GE happens but will get a future advantage in the constititional changes left behind after involving the courts.