Chris in London
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 13,886
1) never said it was your word
2) a detailed account ie she was at the same place at the same time as someone she worked with, literally pointless argument from yourself. In the context of this story it’s pretty meaningless, unless you think if you can prove you were in the same room as someone that must mean you cannot be lying.
3) I didn’t dodge the question, do I believe Johnson sexually abused a woman 20 years ago.? I could I even possibly now.
The result Of this remains to be seen? Probably best putting the pitchfork away until you have anything apart from your bias to go on.
Lol.
Since you aren’t dodging the question, let’s explore this further.
She has given a detailed account of what she says happened, he has issued a bare denial. Would you agree that the likelihood is very strongly that EITHER the incident happened pretty much as she described it OR that the entire thing is a complete fabrication, almost certainly done for malicious reasons? There seems little scope for instance for the possibility that he put his hand between her legs and squeezed her inner thigh by accident.
