The Conservative Party

[Rascal]

I see the days of Cameron's Liberal Toryism are well and truly over, Priti Patel going full on Authoritarian Tory with that speech.

I listened to it on the radio but I imagined her strutting around the stage like a well known Austrian born fella

 

[Blue Hefner]

I see the days of Cameron's Liberal Toryism are well and truly over, Priti Patel going full on Authoritarian Tory with that speech.

I listened to it on the radio but I imagined her strutting around the stage like a well known Austrian born fella

I can’t think who you mean. Mozart didn’t strut, after all.....

 

[The perfect fumble]

Just can’t get the image of Benny Hill out of my mind.

 

[Rascal]

I can’t think who you mean. Mozart didn’t strut, after all.....

She certainly was not constructing a Sinfonia concertante nor was she doing a passable impression of Hans Krankl

 

[Blue Hefner]

She certainly was not constructing a Sinfonia concertante nor was she doing a passable impression of Hans Krankl

I think their transition into UKIP is almost complete

 

[DelToro]

What is it with these tory cunts they just sit there arms folded, maybe a dozen or so clapping.

Interchangeable with United fans.

 

[The perfect fumble]

I see the days of Cameron's Liberal Toryism are well and truly over, Priti Patel going full on Authoritarian Tory with that speech.

I listened to it on the radio but I imagined her strutting around the stage like a well known Austrian born fella

 

[mat]

Not sure about the trailer for the new series of The Thick Of It.

 

[TheRemainsOfTheDave]

Not sure about the trailer for the new series of The Thick Of It.

I think "No Disposable Cups" is third on the list after "Safety Scissors allowed under supervision" & "Non-Toxic Crayons only".

He does have a look of Ralph Wiggum now I think of it.

 

[hilts]

Lol.

Since you aren’t dodging the question, let’s explore this further.

She has given a detailed account of what she says happened, he has issued a bare denial. Would you agree that the likelihood is very strongly that EITHER the incident happened pretty much as she described it OR that the entire thing is a complete fabrication, almost certainly done for malicious reasons? There seems little scope for instance for the possibility that he put his hand between her legs and squeezed her inner thigh by accident.

It’s a bit boring now to be honest(detailed account haha) not sure why you need your bias confirmation to be accepted by others, are we a tiny bit needy per chance,(conclusion jumping by me tut tut we all hate that) anyhow the dumb ass has done plenty to prove his worth I’m not really concerned about an event that happened 20 years ago that cannot be proven.

I hope the girl has fully recovered from her 20 year nightmare and now she can share her tale this will give her the closure she needs to carry on with her new job in the media. I believe the Met have their best detective on the case so we may found out what happened and you can stop fretting about it.

 

[Chris in London]

I think "No Disposable Cups" is third on the list after "Safety Scissors allowed under supervision" & "Non-Toxic Crayons only".

He does have a look of Ralph Wiggum now I think of it.

Mrs London has an uncanny ability to make a sentence as benign as ‘it’s the green bin tonight’ or ‘Jack and Jill are coming for dinner tomorrow’ sound uncannily like ‘you fucking idiot.’

‘No disposable cups’ has a similar ring to it.

 

[Chris in London]

It’s a bit boring now to be honest(detailed account haha) not sure why you need your bias confirmation to be accepted by others, are we a tiny bit needy per chance,(conclusion jumping by me tut tut we all hate that) anyhow the dumb ass has done plenty to prove his worth I’m not really concerned about an event that happened 20 years ago that cannot be proven.

I hope the girl has fully recovered from her 20 year nightmare and now she can share her tale this will give her the closure she needs to carry on with her new job in the media. I believe the Met have their best detective on the case so we may found out what happened and you can stop fretting about it.

Oh, I see. You ARE ducking the issue. My mistake, I thought you said you weren’t.

Never mind. You are by no means the only one.

 

[hilts]

Oh, I see. You ARE ducking the issue. My mistake, I thought you said you weren’t.

Never mind. You are by no means the only one.

What am I ducking precisely my angst ridden friend?

 

[Chris in London]

What am I ducking precisely my angst ridden friend?

This one (post 4837)

This woman may have her own agenda, she may not have reported it, etc. However she has now given a detailed account of what happened,when it happened, where she was in relation to him and who she discussed it with that same evening. She is a person that members of government and opposition appear to hold in high regard as regards her general truthfulness.

Boris, who recently denied saying millions had been spaffed up the wall investigating historical sexual abuse cases when many recordings of him saying exactly that exist, has issued a bare denial.

Who do you believe?

 

[I'm With Stupid]

Not sure about the trailer for the new series of The Thick Of It.

Based on his previous record of trying to game the Google search results, I can only assume he's been involved in a scandal involving cups that he wants to cover up.

 

[hilts]

This one (post 4837)

I think you will find I said a while back I don’t know what happened maybe your attention to detail isn’t up to this girls standards. I know Boris is a tit but I have no experience of this women or her likelihood to tell a mistruth, I have said the timing appears suspect so it kind of cancels each other out.

So to put this to bed finally I find it somewhat stupid to ask me if I believe a total strangers account of an incident 20 years ago which I have no knowledge of. There has been and will be better things to dump on Johnson’s head than a generation ago he said she said.

I hope this is sufficient enough for you random bluemoon poster.

 

[Chris in London]

I think you will find I said a while back I don’t know what happened maybe your attention to detail isn’t up to this girls standards. I know Boris is a tit but I have no experience of this women or her likelihood to tell a mistruth, I have said the timing appears suspect so it kind of cancels each other out.

So to put this to bed finally I find it somewhat stupid to ask me if I believe a total strangers account of an incident 20 years ago which I have no knowledge of. There has been and will be better things to dump on Johnson’s head than a generation ago he said she said.

I hope this is sufficient enough for you random bluemoon poster.

Of course you don’t know what happened, unless you were there. Juries up and down the country every day make decisions not about what they know (nothing - they weren’t there) but who they believe. Since jurors are not allowed to sit on cases where they know the accused, they have to make up their minds about that without any experience of the complainant. (That said, those who do know this woman that have commented in the media have stated that she has a high reputation for truthfulness.)

The reason we are having this exchange is because I posted something that included the line ‘if he has done what is alleged he should be on the sexual offences register,’ to which your response was ‘if.’ So the question you think is stupid is one your own post begs.

I ask you again whether you believe the account this journalist has provided.

 

[kevin horlocks wand]

Of course you don’t know what happened, unless you were there. Juries up and down the country every day make decisions not about what they know (nothing - they weren’t there) but who they believe. Since jurors are not allowed to sit on cases where they know the accused, they have to make up their minds about that without any experience of the complainant. (That said, those who do know this woman that have commented in the media have stated that she has a high reputation for truthfulness.)

The reason we are having this exchange is because I posted something that included the line ‘if he has done what is alleged he should be on the sexual offences register,’ to which your response was ‘if.’ So the question you think is stupid is one your own post begs.

I ask you again whether you believe the account this journalist has provided.

Stop pretending you are a Supreme Court judge it’s coming across as a bit
patronising

 

[hilts]

Of course you don’t know what happened, unless you were there. Juries up and down the country every day make decisions not about what they know (nothing - they weren’t there) but who they believe. Since jurors are not allowed to sit on cases where they know the accused, they have to make up their minds about that without any experience of the complainant. (That said, those who do know this woman that have commented in the media have stated that she has a high reputation for truthfulness.)

The reason we are having this exchange is because I posted something that included the line ‘if he has done what is alleged he should be on the sexual offences register,’ to which your response was ‘if.’ So the question you think is stupid is one your own post begs.

I ask you again whether you believe the account this journalist has provided.

It’s really not hard Rumpole , I wasn’t there, I don’t know the woman how can I say if i believe her or not. You choose to believe her because of Boris and his reputation. You don’t know anything about this women as far as I can tell but I know I don’t know anything about her.

I’m starting to think you must be her husband:-)

 

[Chippy_boy]

Of course you don’t know what happened, unless you were there. Juries up and down the country every day make decisions not about what they know (nothing - they weren’t there) but who they believe. Since jurors are not allowed to sit on cases where they know the accused, they have to make up their minds about that without any experience of the complainant. (That said, those who do know this woman that have commented in the media have stated that she has a high reputation for truthfulness.)

The reason we are having this exchange is because I posted something that included the line ‘if he has done what is alleged he should be on the sexual offences register,’ to which your response was ‘if.’ So the question you think is stupid is one your own post begs.

I ask you again whether you believe the account this journalist has provided.

Jesus Christ let it drop for fucks sake. You are being INTERMINABLY boring. No-one cares what you think about this. No-one.