This comment is a classic piece of Liverpool post event attempted rationalisation and re-writing of the facts -"This was an argument over the ownership of scouting information gathered by a person while they worked for City, but, believing the ownership to be his, still accessed it after he had moved to Liverpool. I strongly suspect City were in the right. But the incident is far removed from "hacking", as being claimed by the sensationalist headlines."
Is that part of the article or a fan comment?