kevin horlocks wand
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Mar 2016
- Messages
- 9,648
Tell some of your Brexit buddies, especially the pompous piffler who wants the English to have a vote on Scottish independence.
Well that’s clearly not right is it.
Tell some of your Brexit buddies, especially the pompous piffler who wants the English to have a vote on Scottish independence.
Am I right in thinking that Boris has to take his deal to the EU on the 17th and it's likely they won't accept it.
Then he has to take it to UK Parliament (if the EU have accepted it) and it's likely to get voted down anyway?
Then he'd be forced into asking for another extension?
You mean you thought I was serious about people not being able to spell x and would get lost on their way to a polling station?I don't think you understand the concept of a "whoosh".
Where's the sarcasm from you in that post? It's exactly what you feel.
I understand why people want to leave, I just think the pros are outweighed by the consAre you suggesting you now understand ours?
But it would ruin the economy, create a border, etc, etc...Yeah we know we haven’t left.
Imagine if the Scots voted for independence and leave won by 52% and somehow leaving the uk was frustrated . Can you imagine the anger.
Only if you support the EU.I understand why people want to leave, I just think the pros are outweighed by the cons
Would that involve us giving them free access to our market whilst they also accessed the EU one ?
Or would we block that ?
"we" as a colloquialism for "UK". I should have thought that was easy enough to figure out when discussing veto's.Please, enough with the 'we' stuff.
There is no 'we' amongst the leave vote.
People had their own reasons, not yours.
Or support analysis of expertsOnly if you support the EU.
Good luck to Nicola negotiating the replacement to the Barnett formula with the eu.....
There would be no easy solution to a border, if we were no longer in the EU.
So, like with Brexit, it would lead to a total fucking shitshow, obviously.
"we" as a colloquialism for "UK". I should have thought that was easy enough to figure out when discussing veto's.
No I was talking about the fact that "we" have veto's. We here having the meaning of the UK.You were attributing reasons why 'we' left.
There are people who don't know or care about a 'European Army'.
You were attributing reasons why 'we' left.
There are people who don't know or care about a 'European Army'.
Yeah but it would be for the people of Scotland to decide for themselves if they fancied a shitshow or not
But the people of Scotland don't even know about the full ramifications of leaving the UK. It's too complicated, 300+ years of union, tied up legalities, for ordinary voters of Scotland to understand, and the majority probably don't care about them anyway,. For those reasons alone, they should not be consulted on their membership of the UK union.Yeah but it would be for the people of Scotland to decide for themselves if they fancied a shitshow or not
I don’t know or care about death but I know it’s coming one day
True, but that’s because death isn’t avoidable by anyone. Thus it’s not a great metaphor.I don’t know or care about death but I know it’s coming one day
As i've told you time and time again, it's not about veto's, it's about opposing what Europe is becoming at the hands of a few.
The EU goes down a path we disagree with, and we say "we want no part of it", just proves how the political aspects of the EU and the UK are completely different and that we shold be part of a European organisation that has no such aspirations.
Well many of those that did, and oppose it, voted a certain way when Parliament asked to consult them on it.You were attributing reasons why 'we' left.
There are people who don't know or care about a 'European Army'.