Chris in London
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 13,888
It has not been ignored, has it? But for the sake of argument let’s pretend it has been. Let’s say some voter for a Norway option but are now being told we will now rip up 40years worth of agreements. I don’t think that’s acceptable - that is taking someone’s vote and taking liberties
On top of that it was an advisory referendum so they are free to ignore it if they wish. But like I said, I don’t accept it has been ignored. There is an offer on the table it’s just that some thought it left us worse off than we are now(as is an MPs right) and some thought it wasn’t Brexitey enough, which again is their right. Which leaves us where we are now
So now, we have two clear and obvious options. Rip everything up or stay as we are
It’s pretty clear that we are arriving fast at the point where the only options are no deal and no Brexit. I’ve put this point to a number of people who would prefer to leave with a deal but are faced with having to choose between two options they don’t like. Those who have said they would prefer a no deal Brexit to no Brexit at all have, to a man, said that they would do so because to do otherwise would undermine democracy.
Quite apart from whether it would undermine democracy, I find it interesting that not one person has said that there is any sort of economic benefit, or constitutional advantage, or increase of sovereignty or anything.
In other words, the supposed advantages of Brexit have vanished from view. All that’s left is that Leave won.