Another new Brexit thread

[Saddleworth2]

What did everybody in Scotland vote to remain, I am sorry but I do not believe you.

Good challenge. It was of course only 62%. They represent constuencies (rather than constituents) that voted Remain. Thanks.

 

[Saddleworth2]

A field of bursting bagpipes would emit a more reasoned cacophony than that one-eyed, jeering, charlie-snorting, bunch of misfits.

As ever George, an intelligent and balanced view from your good self.

 

[carlosthejackal]

Chris Grayling !! How would anybody pay attention to this idiot.

 

[George Hannah]

Starmer getting to the nitty-gritty of the wording changes between May's WA and the current one.

would you like to rephrase that observation perhaps?

 

[Metal Biker]

What did everybody in Scotland vote to remain, I am sorry but I do not believe you.

Those in Scotland who voted to leave have no representation by the SNP... even by those SNP voters who also voted to leave. ;)

 

[lancs blue]

would you like to rephrase that observation perhaps?

Why?

 

[blueinsa]

They are there to represent Scotland’s interests and those of their constituents who all voted to remain.

That is simply not true is it?

 

[aguero93:20]

Chris Grayling !! How would anybody pay attention to this idiot.

Well, for example, if you were a Tory party donor with a shipping company that owned no ships...

 

[Metal Biker]

Good challenge. It was of course only 62%. They represent constuencies (rather than constituents) that voted Remain. Thanks.

Ahh like those LAbour MP's who represent the 61% of Labour constituencies that voted to leave... yet don't.

 

[George Hannah]

Why?

I'll let @Bigga explain, I'm not qualified.

 

[Saddleworth2]

That is simply not true is it?

Already acknowledged mate. Constituencies not constituents.

 

[blueinsa]

Good challenge. It was of course only 62%. They represent constuencies (rather than constituents) that voted Remain. Thanks.

You wont mind MP's representing leave constituencies backing leave then?

 

[Saddleworth2]

Ahh like those LAbour MP's who represent the 61% of Labour constituencies that voted to leave... yet don't.

What’s your point? The discussion was about behaviour in the HoC.

 

[urban genie]

A few more sneaking off to the bar then.

Starmer being factual and precise

 

[yerwot?]

Why they use the fisheries as validation I still don't get.

A deal or no deal won't mean more fishing rights or better catches.

,

Overwhelmingly controlled by two firms/family . Big in a small industry, but blown out of all proportion by the media because it's easy to throw a union jack over a dead fish and a (photo-shopped out) somali deckhand. Appeals to the readership of the hate-mail, which at the same time disdainfully dismisses the loss of many thousands of car-worker's jobs as project fear, (and any way they all vote labour so a good thing).

 

[Saddleworth2]

You wont mind MP's representing leave constituencies backing leave then?

What in Scotland? Are there any?

 

[bluethrunthru]

Those in Scotland who voted to leave have no representation by the SNP... even by those SNP voters who also voted to leave. ;)

All 13 Scottish Tory MP's elected in 2017 are pro-Remain then? Johnson has no chance today then if he cannot count on their votes.

 

[blueinsa]

What in Scotland? Are there any?

No but then no SNP MP's represent the 17.4 million leave voters yet they want to say their vote didn't count.

Keep your nose out of Scotlands business is the mantra yet they have no issue in sticking theirs into the business of the rest of the UK.

 

[blueinsa]

Starmer just owned on workers rights there and sums the ridiculous argument they are trying to push.

 

[Coatigan]

That is simply not true is it?

Given that every constituency they represent voted to remain, how is it not?

You apply the exact same logic to labour MPs in leave constituencies.