aguerrrroooooooooooo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Feb 2016
- Messages
- 11,040
You're correct, I was more referring to the negotiation aspect though.That wouldn’t end it, it’d still be in our politics for the next decade if that happened.
You're correct, I was more referring to the negotiation aspect though.That wouldn’t end it, it’d still be in our politics for the next decade if that happened.
I use this thread to ask questions hence the ? ;)So basically (with respect) you don't know that Boris has made any threats at all :-)
He is quite within his rights (IMHO) if there are a plethora of formal requests to change the deal and make it totally unrecongnisable to withdraw it... We need to see what happens in the vote before we can make any judgements
Hypothetical. If there is no UK. i.e. if Scotland leaves and possibly NI too, what then is the purpose of the DUP, or the UUP for that matter.This Conservative and Unionist party will be responsible for the break up of the UK. Shame on them.
With all due respect I'm not sure how you can be sure on that. Why are we working towards a self imposed deadline?really.... they are reviewing the amendments to the May deal that was well understood. As I said earlier they have enough experts in their individual teams to get this done... I agree that they are being challenged here but no more than anybody else in business...
If they are in doubt then they can oppose the deal... not ideal because given time they might choose to go with it.. but it's an option
Google "Bite sized chunks" Karen,, we're talking about educated people here with access to the best constitutional experts and legal brains in the land.. not a bunch of kids on a Prince's Trust team-building dayHow do you expect them to read the document,digest,raise any objections and vote on it in 24hrs? it's not like it's a massive complicated decision,no-one is going to trust boris after all his antics,it's got to be read and debated and water tight so he can't change anything later on
It is a little rich to argue that they can't find the time to debate this... it is standard practice in business to work to deadlines... if you can't hit the deadline working normal hours then it's not rocket science.. you put another shift in...
They get a bloody good wage and therefore a little overtime is not going to kill them is it
Ah the good old ?I use this thread to ask questions hence the ? ;)
So what's the issueThere is no deadline.
Could you make it up Jeff?
I couldn't.
The Conservative and UNIONIST Party.
They (DUP) can always do a merger with Renua and that Toibin fuckwit and campaign to time travel back to the 18th century I suppose.Hypothetical. If there is no UK. i.e. if Scotland leaves and possibly NI too, what then is the purpose of the DUP, or the UUP for that matter.
So what's the issue
Good point.So leave voters ... Boris’s deal. Is this what you voted for in the original referendum ?
.
So what's the issue
Drag the whole island of Ireland back.They (DUP) can always do a merger with Renua and that Toibin fuckwit and campaign to time travel back to the 18th century I suppose.
Funny guy.... I was trying to counter the argument that MPs don't have enough time to debate this... Corbyn said it himself today.. I've watched on and off all afternoon so why the fuss if there is no deadlineYou tell me. You’re the one banging on about deadlines and working MPs through the night to meet it.
But I've just been told there is no deadline?The government are trying to force an artificial and unnecessary timeframe on the HoC, and people who don't work for the government are resisting. It's not difficult to understand.
But I've just been told there is no deadline?
Didn't Liz shake hands with McGuinness?
And if I'm not mistaken isn't there a photo of Charles having a laugh with Gerry Adams?At least 3 times.