Talksport

Is Jim White our very own Frank Sinatra?

He's just called a blue a man with a degree in paranoia.

Sinclair backed up his claim saying hes been in a meeting with the PL where Scudamore said the PL had 12 big teams they needed to promote. He then questioned why the PL run PiGMOL. Shite shut him down.
Surely that is now 14 big teams......
 
You could almost hear white’s face change from his sneery, put-down mode, as he realised that to a man, the fans of other clubs had spotted the blatant dipper bias, and well done T Sinclair for sticking with it.
Sadly they had to move on to more relevant and important issues like Fashunu’s career in gladiators.
Good job they’re a serious, well respected station.
 

Caught part of the discussion about Pep getting angry with Stones not being ready to go on. Trev (and Natalie whoever) were saying it was no big deal. Stupid White asked if he thought that the press gave an easier ride to Klopp than Pep and Trev said one billion per cent. Come on Trev you know its 2 billion.

The word agenda popped up and White said in a sarky tone 'here we go'. And so it went on. Well said Trev
 
Caught part of the discussion about Pep getting angry with Stones not being ready to go on. Trev (and Natalie whoever) were saying it was no big deal. Stupid White asked if he thought that the press gave an easier ride to Klopp than Pep and Trev said one billion per cent. Come on Trev you know its 2 billion.

The word agenda popped up and White said in a sarky tone 'here we go'. And so it went on. Well said Trev

I caught about 10 minutes and he said, after the news, we'll be looking 'is there a bias/agenda against Spurs' it really is the most useless of stations now.
 
I've just tried to listen to the bit about City/Pep but, to be honest, it's still that shite that I can't sit through it even when you can delete the adverts. It really is radio for the uneducated rags and dippers and they're welcome to it.
 
If you missed it. The Drive a show is doing the doing the same with that beacon of neutrality Danny Murphy in for the yorkie.
 
Talking about the agenda now on drivetime..and durham is agreeing with the reporting aimed towards our club

Highlighting the difference of reporting towards us against the likes of liverpool
 
Not sure if that is his nickname, but his Christian name is Bruce. And he knows apples from pears.
He used to be the Editor of the Racing Post, he’s very good on a lot of Sports and comes across as a very balanced Journalists. Before he was the Editor he was the football tipster, his articles were always well researched and informative.
 
Durham talking sense.
Did I just really say that?

changed the word agenda to reporting, he states that he doesn't see an agenda as the media is so big - but he has agreed that we do get reported on differently compared to the likes of liverpool etc etc

He has just said why is van dick lauded as the best player the planet and put forward for all awards, when Sterling has been the much better player

Murphy then said maybe it is an agenda against pep
 
Yaawn...dipper caller going about coutinho money now and how it funded just about the whole squad - absolutely laughable. so how much have liverpool spent since 1990 then ???

The hate spilling out his mouth was evident
 
They started out discussing if the media have an agenda when it comes to City. Then some dipper on the phone and Danny Murphy turned it into an agenda against City. Twats the lot of them.
 
Yaawn...dipper caller going about coutinho money now and how it funded just about the whole squad - absolutely laughable. so how much have liverpool spent since 1990 then ???

The hate spilling out his mouth was evident
Did they not lose 80 million of that money to agents.
 
I caught about 10 minutes and he said, after the news, we'll be looking 'is there a bias/agenda against Spurs' it really is the most useless of stations now.

Yes i lost the bit I was listening to for an ad break too. White narked me by playing innocent as if he was unaware but then went on about it being the tabloid papers.

I don't think any right minded person can deny that City fare badly against the media darlings as the number of BBC articles on the rags, dippers and Spurs showed compared with none on City showed.

The only things in dispute is if there is any collaboration as they all seem to do it and what is their motive and intentions. I know what it looks like.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top