Another new Brexit thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Of course the Tories could cock it up again. That's the reason they lost their big lead last time, it was because May was fucking useless. Maybe they will fuck it up again, but they could never run a campaign as utterly useless as the last one.

Don't be too sure. They cocked up the last campaign deliberately in order to sabotage brexit, which many on the right do not want .

If this sounds ridiculous, ask yourself, what possible reason could a Tory govt have to call an unnecessary election in the first place, and then campaign on a headline policy of "you know that house that we've spent 40 years telling you to save for as it will provide you certainty and allow you to leave your children a stake in society? You know the one, we haven't shut up about it for 40 years, it's been THE central plank of our philosophy. Yeah, well all of a sudden we're changing our policy so if you vote us in we will take it off you the moment you need care in old age. No it's, no buts, you're losing your home if you vote Tory"

Guess which section of the population that affected the most. The older generation. Who traditionally vote Tory in droves . Many stayed home and the election was almost lost, which would have let labour in (and stuffed them with the blame for brexit allowing the Tories to spend the NEXT 40 years bitching about Europe without actually having to do anything about it).

Their plan was foiled because people in the centre are scared of Corbyn and those on the left don't trust him because he is a liar and a hypocrite .

I expect something similar this time. Boris wants someone else to do the hard yards on brexit, fail, and then allow him to be the anti EU guy that doesn't actually have to leave the EU .
 
Don't be too sure. They cocked up the last campaign deliberately in order to sabotage brexit, which many on the right do not want .

If this sounds ridiculous, ask yourself, what possible reason could a Tory govt have to call an unnecessary election in the first place, and then campaign on a headline policy of "you know that house that we've spent 40 years telling you to save for as it will provide you certainty and allow you to leave your children a stake in society? You know the one, we haven't shut up about it for 40 years, it's been THE central plank of our philosophy. Yeah, well all of a sudden we're changing our policy so if you vote us in we will take it off you the moment you need care in old age. No it's, no buts, you're losing your home if you vote Tory"

Guess which section of the population that affected the most. The older generation. Who traditionally vote Tory in droves . Many stayed home and the election was almost lost, which would have let labour in (and stuffed them with the blame for brexit allowing the Tories to spend the NEXT 40 years bitching about Europe without actually having to do anything about it).

Their plan was foiled because people in the centre are scared of Corbyn and those on the left don't trust him because he is a liar and a hypocrite .

I expect something similar this time. Boris wants someone else to do the hard yards on brexit, fail, and then allow him to be the anti EU guy that doesn't actually have to leave the EU .
Well I suppose it's one interpretation. I doubt you'll find many people who agree with your theory however.

I think it had more to do with the fact that we do have a ticking time bomb with respect to spiralling care costs for the elderly, and May thought she was in an unassailable position so thought she could get the dirty laundry out and still win comfortably.
 
This is peak Georgie Porgie.

Let me make it short and simple. For Marx the society is divided into owners of the means of production and the proletariat i.e, the labour class, which has nothing to sell but its physical labour.The Communist Manifesto begins with Marx's interpretation of class struggle. As long as the society continues to be divided into two classes, there is no chance for any good of the labourers. So, Marx provides us with his remedy to make the society equal for all and that is the proletarian revolution. The revolution will result into a communist society based on the idea of “from each according to his ability to each according to his needs”. Communism will not immediately follow the revolution but has to pass through a transitional phase of SOCIALISM.
Socialism is the important word here because Corbyn and McDonnell DONT envisage the endgame of Marxism just the path. Marxism ultimately is an attempt to remove the disjoint between human essence and its existence. At the heart of Marx's thought is his deep concern for man and his future. For him, human essence is a totality of social relationship. His central criticism of capitalism is that man was stripped of his human essence when he first fell into the class of the exploited and faced the destruction of all humanity in him under capitalism. it is a scientific revolutionary philosophy which points the way to get rid of exploitation, oppression and injustice in the society which is surely a good thing.
This bit
from wiki explains the difference better than i can

"• Marxism is more theoretical in nature whereas Socialism is more practical in nature. This is one of the main differences between Marxism and Socialism. • Another difference between Marxism and Socialism is that Marxism is political in its concepts whereas Socialism is economic in its ideologies."

Socialism is economic in its ideologies. In other words, it can be said that Socialism is an economic system wherein all the means of production are owned by the public. Socialism aims at the co-operative system of control over the means of production. Moreover, Socialism is based heavily on cooperative social relations and self-management. It aims at the elimination of hierarchy in the management of political affairs. Hence, it can be said that Socialism too is a kind of political thought though its ideas are based more on the economic issues of the development of society. Socialism aims at the achievement of the state of production for use. Its ideas see to it that the allocation inputs are carried out in the right manner to satisfy human needs. This is the crux of socialism. Socialism is a mixture of reformation and revolution in equal proportions

Here are some of the differences between what a Socialist Labour Party believes and what Marx envisaged.


• Marxism is more theoretical in nature whereas Socialism is more practical in nature. This is one of the main differences between Marxism and Socialism.

• Another difference between Marxism and Socialism is that Marxism is political in its concepts whereas Socialism is economic in its ideologies.

• Socialism speaks about the public ownership of the property and natural resources. Marxism speaks about creating a society where there is no discrimination between rich and poor.

• Marxism speaks about changing the society through a proletariat revolution. Socialism speaks about changing the society by changing the economic structure of the country.

• Marxism proletariat revolution becomes possible because there is an imbalance between social classes. This is created as the bourgeoisie manipulates the working class as the bourgeoisie own capital, land, and entrepreneurship. However, in Socialism, such class discrimination is not possible as the means of production are owned by the public. So, there is no need for a proletariat revolution to happen in a society with socialism.

• In a society where Marxism theory of working class rising against the bourgeoisie happens, there is a largely competitive market. In Socialism, market competitiveness does not exist as the society is made for collectivism and collaboration, not for competition.

• Marxism is pure revolution. Socialism has equal proportions of revolution as well as reformations. The definition of revolution here does not necessarily mean it is violent overthrow just merely revolution by ballot box.

These are the differences between Marxism and Socialism so to categorise Corbyn and McDonnell as full blown Marxists is simply untrue, they are Socialists influnced by Marx.


George you sound like an American in the throes of Macarthyism looking for bogeymen where none exist, but I understand it, because the power of the right wing media in this country loves to use convenient labels that encourage opprobrium towards any form of politics that may be even slightly anti-capitalist. When an election is finally called the rhetoric will go through the roof and i am sure the likes of the Mail, Sun and Telegraph will be apocolyptic about Corbyn, but then its those newspapers owners that have most to lose from a victory of the left.


So do democracy a favour George and call it properly, using Marxist as an insult is not only a bit ridiculus but it also opens up others to accusations of fascism and i hope and believe nobody here wants either a full blown Fascist or Communist state, just a victory for good Socialist values of fairness and freedom for all.
That was short and simple? - lol. It was desperate for sure, Corbyn & McDonnell not fully inflated Marxists? Do yourself and us a favour and tell the truth, their version of Socialism is just Marxism light, with the class warfare bit left out because it frightens the voters. Not a sheet of Izal between them and the blessed Karl. As the good Bishop Berkeley told us all long ago, everything is what it is and not another thing. If you just take violent revolution out of Marxism and call it the Socialism of 'old Labour' you empty both of any meaning or intellectual honesty. The Marxists are trying to hijack 'Socialism' like they hijacked the Labour Party and turn it into grotesque parody but the voting public will notice, trust me.
 
Last edited:
This is peak Georgie Porgie.

Let me make it short and simple. For Marx the society is divided into owners of the means of production and the proletariat i.e, the labour class, which has nothing to sell but its physical labour.The Communist Manifesto begins with Marx's interpretation of class struggle. As long as the society continues to be divided into two classes, there is no chance for any good of the labourers. So, Marx provides us with his remedy to make the society equal for all and that is the proletarian revolution. The revolution will result into a communist society based on the idea of “from each according to his ability to each according to his needs”. Communism will not immediately follow the revolution but has to pass through a transitional phase of SOCIALISM.

Socialism is the important word here because Corbyn and McDonnell DONT envisage the endgame of Marxism just the path. Marxism ultimately is an attempt to remove the disjoint between human essence and its existence. At the heart of Marx's thought is his deep concern for man and his future. For him, human essence is a totality of social relationship. His central criticism of capitalism is that man was stripped of his human essence when he first fell into the class of the exploited and faced the destruction of all humanity in him under capitalism. it is a scientific revolutionary philosophy which points the way to get rid of exploitation, oppression and injustice in the society which is surely a good thing.

This bit

from wiki explains the difference better than i can

"• Marxism is more theoretical in nature whereas Socialism is more practical in nature. This is one of the main differences between Marxism and Socialism. • Another difference between Marxism and Socialism is that Marxism is political in its concepts whereas Socialism is economic in its ideologies."

Socialism is economic in its ideologies. In other words, it can be said that Socialism is an economic system wherein all the means of production are owned by the public. Socialism aims at the co-operative system of control over the means of production. Moreover, Socialism is based heavily on cooperative social relations and self-management. It aims at the elimination of hierarchy in the management of political affairs. Hence, it can be said that Socialism too is a kind of political thought though its ideas are based more on the economic issues of the development of society. Socialism aims at the achievement of the state of production for use. Its ideas see to it that the allocation inputs are carried out in the right manner to satisfy human needs. This is the crux of socialism. Socialism is a mixture of reformation and revolution in equal proportions

Here are some of the differences between what a Socialist Labour Party believes and what Marx envisaged.


• Marxism is more theoretical in nature whereas Socialism is more practical in nature. This is one of the main differences between Marxism and Socialism.

• Another difference between Marxism and Socialism is that Marxism is political in its concepts whereas Socialism is economic in its ideologies.

• Socialism speaks about the public ownership of the property and natural resources. Marxism speaks about creating a society where there is no discrimination between rich and poor.

• Marxism speaks about changing the society through a proletariat revolution. Socialism speaks about changing the society by changing the economic structure of the country.

• Marxism proletariat revolution becomes possible because there is an imbalance between social classes. This is created as the bourgeoisie manipulates the working class as the bourgeoisie own capital, land, and entrepreneurship. However, in Socialism, such class discrimination is not possible as the means of production are owned by the public. So, there is no need for a proletariat revolution to happen in a society with socialism.

• In a society where Marxism theory of working class rising against the bourgeoisie happens, there is a largely competitive market. In Socialism, market competitiveness does not exist as the society is made for collectivism and collaboration, not for competition.

• Marxism is pure revolution. Socialism has equal proportions of revolution as well as reformations. The definition of revolution here does not necessarily mean it is violent overthrow just merely revolution by ballot box.

These are the differences between Marxism and Socialism so to categorise Corbyn and McDonnell as full blown Marxists is simply untrue, they are Socialists influnced by Marx.


George you sound like an American in the throes of Macarthyism looking for bogeymen where none exist, but I understand it, because the power of the right wing media in this country loves to use convenient labels that encourage opprobrium towards any form of politics that may be even slightly anti-capitalist. When an election is finally called the rhetoric will go through the roof and i am sure the likes of the Mail, Sun and Telegraph will be apocolyptic about Corbyn, but then its those newspapers owners that have most to lose from a victory of the left.


So do democracy a favour George and call it properly, using Marxist as an insult is not only a bit ridiculus but it also opens up others to accusations of fascism and i hope and believe nobody here wants either a full blown Fascist or Communist state, just a victory for good Socialist values of fairness and freedom for all.

Pretty impressive for a Sunday morning.
 
That was short and simple? - lol. It was desperate for sure, Corbyn & McDonnell not fully inflated Marxists? Do yourself and us a favour and tell the truth, their version of Socialism is just Marxism light, with the class warfare bit left out because it frightens the voters. Not a sheet of Izal between them and the blessed Karl. As the good Bishop Berkeley told us all long ago, everything is what it is and not another thing. If you just take violent revolution out of Marxism and call it the Socialism of 'old Labour' you empty both of any meaning or intellectual honesty. The Marxists are trying to hijack 'Socialism' like they hijacked the Labour Party and turn it into grotesque parody but the voting public will notice, trust me.

If you cant see the difference then what more can I do George, you are convinced, I think I will convince myself Johnson is Mussolini.
 
The obvious reason. Because you don't normally vote for no confidence in yourself.
But it would have triggered a general election, which is what they all want. If Corbyn did it this week he’d get it through, did it in January and didn’t get it through. You know full well what the difference is. A very good chance of losing in January and a very good chance of winning in December which is exactly the opposite for the Labour Party.
 
If you cant see the difference then what more can I do George, you are convinced, I think I will convince myself Johnson is Mussolini.
Benito like Karl is quietly decomposing - unlike the Communist Manifesto it seems - which apparently continues to provide daily inspiration for you and your True Socialist heroes leading the Labour Party.
 
Last edited:
But it would have triggered a general election, which is what they all want. If Corbyn did it this week he’d get it through, did it in January and didn’t get it through. You know full well what the difference is. A very good chance of losing in January and a very good chance of winning in December which is exactly the opposite for the Labour Party.
I cannot imagine any party voting in favour of no confidence in itself. But these are indeed interesting times, so who knows.
 
It looks like the Libs have teamed up with the Jocks to put a motion forward for a 9 December GE, which will
give labour a real dose of the Heebie Jeebies, if passed.
12 Dec, 9 Dec, Christmas day if you like, bring it on.
 
So these policies are toxic?

1. All school class sizes to be under 30 pupils.
2. Ban opening of any new grammar schools
3. Stop the sell off of the NHS (Abolish the NHS Health act of 2012.
4. Implement to Eu Tax Avoidance directive (should raise about £6bill)
5. Restore Nurses training bursaries (just putting back what we used to have)
6. Register and fines for landlords who rent out bad accommodation
7. Introduce a National Education service
8. Grant UK Citizenship for Eu residents.
9. Eradicate rough sleeping by 2020
10. End the public sector pay freeze.
11. Reverse the Capital Gains tax cut (going back to what we used to have and raising £735 mill)
12. Reverse the Inheritance Tax cut (going back to what we used to have raising £1 bill)
13. Provide an allowance for unpaid carers (who save us and the NHS a fortune)
14. Apply VAT to the purchase of Private medical insurance.
15.Apply VAT to the purchase of private education.
16. Build 100000 council / social homes per annum.
17. Halt cuts to women's refuges,
18. Free School meals
19. £1.5 bill for social care
20. Ban Fracking


Really ? Or is it the renationalisation of stuff that worries you

Water Utilities ( suppose to introduce competition but I still cant shop around .... and any profit made seems to be shunted off to a hedge fund based in Hong Kong)
Rail (what a farce that is .... my local franchise is owned by the Dutch Government ... any profit made is used to reduce train fares in Holland)
Electricity ( My supplier is E.on .... a German company .... that buys its energy from RWE - also an E.on company.... that outsources its billing and customers services to E.on business services a separate company... do you see how it works yet?

Or maybe its stuff like

Halting Surestart closures
Stop selling arms to unethical countries like Saudi Arabia
Doubling the number of apprenticeships
Free parking at hospitals
5% of premier league TV rights diverted to grass routes football
3000 more prison officers (after all we dont really need them do we - our prisons get glowing reports dont they and we are only going back to what we use to have )
3000 more firefighters (not even close to what we used to have)





All policies which if you actually stopped to read and think about them actually BENEFIT society - and theres over 100 of them -

Benefit society??????, the tories are incapable of such a thing, THEY NEVER HAVE , never will, would be akin to a leech becoming a vegetarian. Things we take for granted now, were/are vehemently opposed by the tories, little things like everyone having the vote, including Women!!!!, ending slavery , making child labour illegal, enabling trade unions to fight for workers rights (bitterly opposed to this day,) universal health care funded by national insurance contributions,(bitterly opposed to this day) a minimum wage, bitterly opposed to this day, tories insisting it would "destroy british industry at a stroke". Rolling back these MARXIST measures is the Very heart of the brexit plot, everything else is pure bullshit, camouflage, obfuscation, thatcher ideology with added venom wrapped up in populist, racist, nationalistic propaganda and rammed down the public's throat by the billionaire owned mainstream at every possible opportunity. The referendum being the culmination of a thirty year anti-EU Campaign , which has seen the trashing of our once world-class media, into the gutter, in bed with the tory party.
Any form of brexit is an attack on the general public, a brexit with No other strategy than to return to the last century will be very worst outcome for everyone but the landed gentry and disaster capitalists. Civil unrest is founded on anger, a sense of being duped by "the man", and no way out of the shit raining down , all it takes is a spark , be it the complete breakdown of food supplies, hospital and school closures, transport gridlock even police brutality at protest marchers...... it's entirely possible that this is part of the brexit strategy, worked for thatcher during the union bashing years with murdoch's rent-a-mob tactics, not so successful with the poll-tax con......
 
So these policies are toxic?

1. All school class sizes to be under 30 pupils.
2. Ban opening of any new grammar schools
3. Stop the sell off of the NHS (Abolish the NHS Health act of 2012.
4. Implement to Eu Tax Avoidance directive (should raise about £6bill)
5. Restore Nurses training bursaries (just putting back what we used to have)
6. Register and fines for landlords who rent out bad accommodation
7. Introduce a National Education service
8. Grant UK Citizenship for Eu residents.
9. Eradicate rough sleeping by 2020
10. End the public sector pay freeze.
11. Reverse the Capital Gains tax cut (going back to what we used to have and raising £735 mill)
12. Reverse the Inheritance Tax cut (going back to what we used to have raising £1 bill)
13. Provide an allowance for unpaid carers (who save us and the NHS a fortune)
14. Apply VAT to the purchase of Private medical insurance.
15.Apply VAT to the purchase of private education.
16. Build 100000 council / social homes per annum.
17. Halt cuts to women's refuges,
18. Free School meals
19. £1.5 bill for social care
20. Ban Fracking


Really ? Or is it the renationalisation of stuff that worries you

Water Utilities ( suppose to introduce competition but I still cant shop around .... and any profit made seems to be shunted off to a hedge fund based in Hong Kong)
Rail (what a farce that is .... my local franchise is owned by the Dutch Government ... any profit made is used to reduce train fares in Holland)
Electricity ( My supplier is E.on .... a German company .... that buys its energy from RWE - also an E.on company.... that outsources its billing and customers services to E.on business services a separate company... do you see how it works yet?

Or maybe its stuff like

Halting Surestart closures
Stop selling arms to unethical countries like Saudi Arabia
Doubling the number of apprenticeships
Free parking at hospitals
5% of premier league TV rights diverted to grass routes football
3000 more prison officers (after all we dont really need them do we - our prisons get glowing reports dont they and we are only going back to what we use to have )
3000 more firefighters (not even close to what we used to have)





All policies which if you actually stopped to read and think about them actually BENEFIT society - and theres over 100 of them -
And Labour will implement next to none of them.

"FREE EVERYTHING! We'll get the rich to pay for it all and hope they don't decide to migrate to another country and take their money with them!"

Just a con to canvass your vote. Two cheeks of the same arse.
 
And Labour will implement next to none of them.

"FREE EVERYTHING! We'll get the rich to pay for it all and hope they don't decide to migrate to another country and take their money with them!"

Just a con to canvass your vote. Two cheeks of the same arse.
Spot on. Absolutely spot on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top