UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
A fine is an easy way out for UEFA. They know they can't pin anything on a few seven-year-old emails stolen as part of a criminal enterprise. I wonder if UEFA have even seen the so-called emails. They don't have any evidence. The reputation of Der Spiegel is in tatters over separate (and admitted) cases of fake news. The hacker Rui Pinto is facing a big prison sentence.
But it all hinges on whether City accept "the pinch" this time. UEFA's lawyers seem to be gambling that City will not want years of legal battles that could cost them more than any fine. But what about the scumbags in the UK press who published all the smear allegations that City would be banned fed to them by you know who?
There's the CAS case as well.

If this passes under the bridge we should go after Liverpool Football Club.
 
A fine is an easy way out for UEFA. They know they can't pin anything on a few seven-year-old emails stolen as part of a criminal enterprise. I wonder if UEFA have even seen the so-called emails. They don't have any evidence. The reputation of Der Spiegel is in tatters over separate (and admitted) cases of fake news. The hacker Rui Pinto is facing a big prison sentence.
But it all hinges on whether City accept "the pinch" this time. UEFA's lawyers seem to gambling that City will not want years of legal battles that could cost them more than any fine. But what about the scumbags in the UK press who published all the smear allegations that City would be banned fed to them by you know who?
I know it probably wouldn't make any financial sense to fight a fine, but purely for the integrity of the football club and to show the world what corrupt fuckers are running football and who the clubs that they are pandering to, I would prefer City to categorically deny any wrong doing and let it go to CAS.
A few threats about compensation should we be vindicated, thrown into the mix also.

I'm just sick of how football has gone and would love it all exposed.
 
There's the CAS case as well.

If this passes under the bridge we should go after Liverpool Football Club.
We should go after Liverpool FC but I doubt we will. Our reputation has been trashed but it would be so hard for us to take any legal action against the smear sources. We could go after some of the tabloids though and also those at the BBC who repeated the false allegations as fact.
 
I know it probably wouldn't make any financial sense to fight a fine, but purely for the integrity of the football club and to show the world what corrupt fuckers are running football and who the clubs that they are pandering to, I would prefer City to categorically deny any wrong doing and let it go to CAS.
A few threats about compensation should we be vindicated, thrown into the mix also.

I'm just sick of how football has gone and would love it all exposed.

I agree totally,
Let the case go to CAS for them to make the decision,
 
A fine may be because there are some technical failings, rather than grand scale corruption.

I'm thinking in a similar way to the youth player fine - City broke the rules technically, but clearly had some grounds to understand they were okay (my understanding is that the FA got them wrong, and told City wrong)

If it's over technicalities, and isn't a ridiculous amount, the club would be daft not to take it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.