daztrueblue91
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 4,248
When the idea of VAR was first introduced, I was in favour of it. The idea of correcting blindingly obvious mistakes and bringing more consistency to refs decision making, is something I thought would improve the game.
However, the way it has been implemented is nothing short of a national scandal. I can only think that the referees are sabotaging it to hinder its long-term future, as a justification to its current use. Look at the facts:
What is now beyond proof is that the game is accepting that referees can interpret the laws of the game differently. If VAR isn’t being used to add consistency to the game then what exactly is the point in it?
However, the way it has been implemented is nothing short of a national scandal. I can only think that the referees are sabotaging it to hinder its long-term future, as a justification to its current use. Look at the facts:
- They have brought in differing rules for attackers and defenders.
- They are looking for the tiniest reasons to disallow goals.
- They are still making inconsistent decisions in regards to handballs and penalties.
- The paying fan has a worse match experience than the Sky/BT viewers.
What is now beyond proof is that the game is accepting that referees can interpret the laws of the game differently. If VAR isn’t being used to add consistency to the game then what exactly is the point in it?
