UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
So, by next year, their 2 yr rolling losses will be £125M (£111.8+£13.1M). Therefore, they need £20M profit (-£125+20=-£105M) next year to “break even” over the rolling 3 yr period.

From there, they can then lose £13M the following year (-£112+20=-£92M, and -£92-13=-£105M again).

From there, with aggregate profit of (£20-13M) £7M over the previous 2 yrs, they would be in a position to lose £112M again and still be OK! However, one would hope that this years massive losses would be a single event designed to increase future revenues...which will be needed with a very expensive manager and an expected significant outlay on players.

My guess is that an Everton player will move to Arsenal in the summer for highly inflated fee north of £30m.
 
Beginning to get a bit windy about the silence on this now. The investigation was supposedly concluded months ago and it was agreed that notwithstanding the CAS proceedings they could go ahead and publish their findings. Nothing. The CAS proceedings finished in November but we've heard nothing since. That, in itself, is a departure from all the leaks and speculation that went on for years before. Why has the media suddenly gone so quiet when they couldn't stop mentioning the proceedings before November ?

If UEFA had a "concrete" case they would have banned us by now but the fact that they haven't cleared us either suggests they are intending to punish us regardless. So it doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to suspect that there are negotiations going on. My concern is that directly, or indirectly, the usual suspects are continuing to have input into negotiations that, ostensibly, have fuck all to do with them.

Champions league starts up then we will see the shit media articles.
 
My guess is that an Everton player will move to Arsenal in the summer for highly inflated fee north of £30m.
Why? Usmanov sold his shares in Arsenal to Kroenke.

It has been alleged that Usmanov is the real owner of Everton, and that Moshiri is his front man hence the sponsorship by Usmanov of the training ground and an option on the naming rights of the new stadium (yet to be built but the monies to be paid in advance!)

I bet City's board are looking at this news shaking their heads with a wry smile.
 
Moshiri's long time associate, the oligarch Usmanov, has paid £30m to EFC for the option on naming rights on the new stadium whilst EFC announce losses of £111m! Usmanov is an oligarch who you can liken to Abramovic in terms of the origin of his wealth and his political power. He is a long time associate of Moshiri and already sponsors the Everton training ground Finch Farm.

Let's see what the Guardian and the BBC make of this.
If it is par for the course ie stadium naming rights is it against the rules Marvin?
 
This won't be popular on here but the last 2 or 3 pages show why FFP is required. Everton are being run like Bury on steroids, they have spent £500m on players but unlike Chelsea and City before them they have nothing to show for it. They have a shit squad with only 2 or 3 players anyone would show any interest in. If their owner decides he's not going to plug the holes anymore then they are proper fucked, a Leeds United type scenario awaits them if they're lucky.

FFP at least calls a halt to their spending, without the requirement to make a profit next year then they would just continue to throw good money after bad.
 
This won't be popular on here but the last 2 or 3 pages show why FFP is required. Everton are being run like Bury on steroids, they have spent £500m on players but unlike Chelsea and City before them they have nothing to show for it. They have a shit squad with only 2 or 3 players anyone would show any interest in. If their owner decides he's not going to plug the holes anymore then they are proper fucked, a Leeds United type scenario awaits them if they're lucky.

FFP at least calls a halt to their spending, without the requirement to make a profit next year then they would just continue to throw good money after bad.
But the main ffp relates to UEFA as they are not in Europe will not affect them the pl rules are much laxer.
 
If it is par for the course ie stadium naming rights is it against the rules Marvin?
Well you're as well placed as me to answer but here are my speculations:

It becomes testable if Everton break the Premier League financing rules, and then the relevant questions are is Usmanov, or his company a connected party to Moshiri and is the transaction above market value. It feels like extremely sharp practise to pay now for naming rights of a stadium that has yet to be built. Arguably the option is worthless unless the stadium is built.

The connection between Usmanov and Moshiri has long been considered. There are a couple of sources that are worth checking.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alisher_Usmanov#Suppression_of_online_criticism

David Conn wrote this piece https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...d-moshiri-alisher-usmanov-new-money-ownership and it's notable that his article was amended.
 
But the main ffp relates to UEFA as they are not in Europe will not affect them the pl rules are much laxer.

I'm not sure about laxer, definitely more vague as there appears to be rules but no actual punishment. Europe has to be consider though, you don't spend that amount not to qualify.
 
But the main ffp relates to UEFA as they are not in Europe will not affect them the pl rules are much laxer.
They've lost £111m so that puts them at risk of failing PL rules.

Usmanov already sponsors their training ground, and has now done a deal on the naming rights of their stadium. It looks very much as if Usmanov is keeping EFC afloat or inside of the Premier League rules. However the rules contain caveats about whether a connected party can underwrite that. Its murky. Is Usmanov a connected party? Are the deals in excess of market value.

It all sounds very familiar and yet who is discussing this? This is the point that City fans have made repeatedly. If you were to look into the dealings of any major business or football club, you'd no doubt find all kinds of skeletons and yet our business was played out under the full glare of media scrutiny indeed all kinds of allegations were aired some of which turned out to be false. Who is scrutunising this, or does it not matter because EFC are for the moment not rivals of Liverpool, Arsenal and Man Utd?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.