SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,478
Small point but *top 25.City haven't competed with the top 10 transfer fees, but that's different to jot being able to.
Small point but *top 25.City haven't competed with the top 10 transfer fees, but that's different to jot being able to.
I’m glad it wasn’t boxing, the hammers mascot looked sticky as fuck whereas Moonchester looks like Charles hawtrey inside the costumeDisrespectful to showboat like that :)
Wonder who is inside? It's certainly not the ginger lad who used to be the originals 'helper'.
Certainly made the spelling up. It’s not a tricky fucking word either. Qatar. Five letters.You just made that bit up, didn't you?
It’s been a day on Bluemoon when sesquipedalianism has been laid bare, provoking a retaliatory flurry of floccinaucinihilipilification.
'two bit' league.Absolute bollocks, PSG have paid most of UEFA off & you know that, a to bit league with a club paying 100's of millions in wages not a chance they get round FFP
Your owner & his company have bribed the fucking world, the World Cup is just tip of the ice berg his PSG dealings are a joke
It will all come out you just wait bent as fuck 100%
Sounds like the fans of other clubs talking about us, you don’t know anything about what PSG have or haven’t done.Absolute bollocks, PSG have paid most of UEFA off & you know that, a to bit league with a club paying 100's of millions in wages not a chance they get round FFP
Your owner & his company have bribed the fucking world, the World Cup is just tip of the ice berg his PSG dealings are a joke
It will all come out you just wait bent as fuck 100%
nothing related sadly..i hear UEFA wouldnt let them have sparklersFrankfurt with a massive Fuck UEFA banner behind the goal tonight.
Boooooooooooo!nothing related sadly..i hear UEFA wouldnt let them have sparklers
Cheers'two bit' league.
Whatever PSG did or didn't do, it happened because of FFP. We are in the same boat.Sounds like the fans of other clubs talking about us, you don’t know anything about what PSG have or haven’t done.
You're welcome, although two bit is bigging it up somewhat, imo.Cheers
It’s FACT that their sponsorship deal was overvalued by 93m based on an independent analysis versus the figure Leterme decided to go with. Whilst that’s not proof of paying Leterme off, the only logical conclusion is that Leterme was acting with PSG’s, or rather his mate Nasser Al-Khelaifa’s best interests in mind. And a likely reward for doing that would be sort form of bribe, be it money or otherwise.Sounds like the fans of other clubs talking about us, you don’t know anything about what PSG have or haven’t done.
Con by name...….I read that a few times and I think a 16 year old work experience student must have ghost written it. It makes fuck all sense.
Conn must think his readers are idiots.Seems to be suggesting some compromise could be reached before CAS consider the case. Thought the headline was far-fetched, but I think it means UEFA rather than the Adjudicatory Committee is now in charge of the case rather than UEFA having power over City.
Sounds like the fans of other clubs talking about us, you don’t know anything about what PSG have or haven’t done.
Conn must think his readers are idiots.
He says it is interesting that Soriano says,
“The owner [Sheikh Mansour of Abu Dhabi] has not put any money in this club that has not been properly declared” ... when "Internal City emails published by Der Spiegel in November 2018, which prompted the CFCB investigation, did suggest that Mansour substantially paid the £67.5m sponsorship stated to be from the Abu Dhabi airline Etihad" when a couple of days ago he wrote that the UAE state covered the Etihad sponsorship.
Whatever City do or say will be criticised in some quarters.