Just had a look, that appears to be real.I've seen an email screenshot today on Sad Cafe purporting to from the football leaks hack?
I fear what's more amateur, the Etihad invoicing email or the content which clearly states ADUG and not ADEC?
There was, and I was always against it, however now it’s here it isn’t going away. I’ haven’t seen non celebration of goals at games, there is celebration then a wait. I was at both spurs games with the ruled out goals so I get the problem.There was no clamour for it , I think some of us knew how it would go & it’s been worse , the effect of non celebration of goals I don’t think anyone saw coming , it’s destroyed the best part about football.
Link?Just had a look, that appears to be real.
Not.
I've seen an email screenshot today on Sad Cafe purporting to from the football leaks hack?
I fear what's more amateur, the Etihad invoicing email or the content which clearly states ADUG and not ADEC?
Just had a look, that appears to be real.
Not.
Why , you think Scotlands a far away place, think some fans based further into Scotland than me have season tickets. Is an opinion better if you go to 20 games or 7 ?I thought VAR might be a good idea too but I was wrong and didn't think through the consequences of not being able to celebrate goals fully anymore in case they're reviewed and disallowed 5 minutes later. I don't know any league where they don't use VAR to check goals and can't see it ever not being used for that purpose so I completely disagree that there are places where it works fine and it will work fine in the future.
I never said I've given up football by the way, just my season ticket. I wish more football fans would have done the same to be honest because I think the game would be better but I suppose it's not just your SkySports subscriber who likes VAR although then again, aren't you from Scotland so I can't imagine you get to many matches anyway?
Just had a look, that appears to be real.
Not.
That's because the goals weren'truled out, and I'd like to see any referee make a good reasoned decision in 90 seconds when they have to review numerous angles under huge pressure. The system is flawed.There is nothing wrong with VAR. The problem is with the guys who are in Stockley Park and are implementing it. Afterall they are the ones that take their time to check the video replays. They had no problem last night with VAR all decisions were done within a minute, and were correct.
The der Spiegel stories did have images attatched of the emails.
If I had the energy, I would ask Christoph Winterbach or David Conn what they thought about how the email explicitly says ADUG, but David Conn has confirmed for a fact, that ADUG didn't pay.
And you know this for a fact how exactly?It is.
That's the email. Has Conn confirmed it as a fact it wasn't ADUG - I thought he just lifted Colin's find on the Open Skies investigation?
And you know this for a fact how exactly?
The der Spiegel stories did have images attatched of the emails.
If I had the energy, I would ask Christoph Winterbach or David Conn what they thought about how the email explicitly says ADUG, but David Conn has confirmed for a fact that ADUG didn't pay.
It would just be nice to see them explain the conflict. FairSkies proves Executive Committee paid, email says ADUG...the only conclusion is that the email is wrong and not a record of what happened.
But will they ever admit that?
Why , you think Scotlands a far away place, think some fans based further into Scotland than me have season tickets. Is an opinion better if you go to 20 games or 7 ?
City have confirmed they are real by claiming they are out of context. Never have they said “fabricated” or “fake”.And you know this for a fact how exactly?
Looks bad but if ultimately the Abu Dhabi Exec Committee underwrote the deal which is what is now believed even by our media detractors then how the funds are routed through from the UAE to the owner is really unimportant....unless someone has an argument about related parties.It is.
I watch at home and i hate var,they hardly show the var check anymore,they used to show every check in detail but now they don't bother,one thing is clear though that sky and bt can see the var feed and tell us what the result is before the ref tells us,it's all wrongNo just asking to see if you had a season ticket seen as though you seemed to be critical of me giving up my season ticket in your original post.
Also, I suppose it's relevant to your views on VAR because if you never go to a game, chances are that VAR's going to be much less of a problem for you than it would be for someone who goes week-in, week-out.
Well he's written the article using the Open Skies leak
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...ip-covered-by-abu-dhabi-government-not-etihad
I suppose you could argue he's not presenting it as definite fact in the paper, only detailing the leaked email, but IIRC he was more certain in his language on twitter.
Either way both cannot be true, and I'd love to see someone nail him down to one or other.
The der Spiegel stories did have images attatched of the emails.
If I had the energy, I would ask Christoph Winterbach or David Conn what they thought about how the email explicitly says ADUG, but David Conn has confirmed for a fact that ADUG didn't pay.
It would just be nice to see them explain the conflict. FairSkies proves Executive Committee paid, email says ADUG...the only conclusion is that the email is wrong and not a record of what happened.
But will they ever admit that?