Manchester33
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2012
- Messages
- 7,372
I have a somewhat paradoxical question...
Given the reduction of pollution in China as an example, and the number of cancelled flights/events worldwide. Not to mention the reduction in industrial emissions after workplaces are closed. Is it fair to assume that COVID-19 might indirectly save more lives than it takes, due to clearer air in urban areas and (possibly/hopefully) a reduction of CO2 emissions?
Given the reduction of pollution in China as an example, and the number of cancelled flights/events worldwide. Not to mention the reduction in industrial emissions after workplaces are closed. Is it fair to assume that COVID-19 might indirectly save more lives than it takes, due to clearer air in urban areas and (possibly/hopefully) a reduction of CO2 emissions?