COVID-19 — Coronavirus

Status
Not open for further replies.
You can either agree with medical professionals with nothing to gain either way but have spent their entire careers studying and preparing for this, or you can disagree because you think you know better.
That is a fair position but you need to clarify which experts you mean, as there are quite a few that meet that criteria that don’t agree with the assessment of our experts in this case.

So you mean we can agree with these experts, or other experts, or disagree with all the experts (which, you are right, would be unreasonable at best).
 
Depends what is on dealth certicates,say 1 million old people who often get chest infections and pneumonia and are on tablets and inhalers die at home or in a nursing home,chances are it will be put down as pneumonia or COPD,they won't have been tested or have a post mortem,i think the official figures are WAY under the true figures
surley a simple blood test on the deceased would seperate the figures and corrrect them,or is that beyond them
 
There is a downside to every single restriction and cancellation. That's why we're not all under curfew and locked in our houses.

You do what makes an effective reduction in risk vs the disruption, and after studying it decided that sporting events aren't a big danger.

You can either agree with medical professionals with nothing to gain either way but have spent their entire careers studying and preparing for this, or you can disagree because you think you know better.
Ha or you could stop arguing for the sake of it and looks at what other countries are doing,if there was no benefit then all those countries and sporting events being scrapped are wrong versus our guy who you think is right
 
That is a fair position but you need to clarify which experts you mean, as there are quite a few that meet that criteria that don’t agree with the assessment of our experts in this case.

So you mean we can agree with these experts, or other experts, or disagree with all the experts (which, you are right, would be unreasonable at best).

People keep saying this and yet no one has come up with anyone of note criticising the UK government's response.
 
I don’t see how stopping mass gatherings cannot help? It’s beyond me.

Take away the amount of players and staff that will get it so any competition won’t be viable anyway, but the journey of a fan/spectator leads to the precise breeding grounds I.e close contact, lack of washing facilities etc that they advise against in other areas of life

I'm sure it was said large employers will be encouraged to have staggered break times to avoid numbers congregating, mind boggling as to how this then isn't a problem for all large gatherings, which dwarf workplace breaks
 
Boris started by saying it's somewhere between 5 and 10,000 with it currently.
which puts the mortality rate at between 0.1 and 0.5% in the UK right now.
Unless Karen׳s right and there’s a load of people dying with pneumonia on their death certificate having not been tested.
I really don’t know, and we’ll only find out if the stats for pneumonia and COPD are much higher than usual.
 
we all know why they wont close schools and that the end of it,,but there is another option if your a parent and thats keep them out, do it and do it tomorrow
 
Part of the reluctance to shut schools will likely be due to many of those parents being medical staff. That would be a large chunk of front line staff not available. With the reasoning kids are low risk and most teachers being young and healthy. If they have to close to stop the kids being a carrier the parents will have to stay home, having gran and grandad look after them is not a reasonable solution given this virus is much more of a health risk to them. People are stuck between a rock and a hard place whatever choices they make it seems.
 
Having attempted to digest the press conference, it seems to me that whilst some other countries are trying to do a controlled containment, we are in fact trying to do a controlled spread of the virus.
 
People keep saying this and yet no one has come up with anyone of note criticising the UK government's response.
If you want direct quotes criticising the UK government’s new announcement today then you’ll have to wait a day or two.

People are referring to the many instances of guidance provided by the WHO and CDC that contradict the assessment of sporting event associated public behaviour being a low risk for viral transmission in the context of containment and/or delay of transmission in this pandemic. Or, to it put more accurately, that the risk (both health and economic) is not sufficient to outweigh the possible economic impact of prohibiting sporting events and thus reducing the associated public behaviour that may increase viral transmission.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top