kippax4ever
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Feb 2015
- Messages
- 4,147
Somewhere on the coast, that is vague
Well I didn't see it,but some on here seen it and posted on here,can't remember if its se,sw
Somewhere on the coast, that is vague
So why have the country not imprenented a more severe lockdown than attempt he moment I mean I get it that supermarkets remain open but does the country really need all these little tin pot foreign food shops open on every corner . Chemist and essential supermarkets and that’s it what should be open.
I am put in mind of Pete Postlethwaite in "Closing the Ring".It’s still confidential as no one knows who I’m talking about and this is a mostly anonymous forum.
You’re a strange bloke Vic.
you joined the discussion with "that's not remotely true"
Yes, a point I’ve made half a dozen times to you in this back and forth.They do not know the number of Infected. What the quote actually means is have so few deaths at the moment compared to the number of confirmed infected.
It’s patently obvious they are talking about the difference between their CFR and those in the U.K., Italy, Spain et al.see my post above.
the quote is false. They do not know the number of infected.
I know what you mean, a close relative had the same happen to her several years ago when she was virtually brain dead.This always has been the case. 15 years ago my mum had treatment withdrawn and was allowed to die when it became clear she couldn't be saved. And those medical professionals didn't have a ward full of others and a queue outside the door waiting to be let in all in the same boat. My guess would be those decisions have been made time and time again
Have to laugh, otherwise you’dfactOh give over.
You post a lot of decent stuff, however you go missing when you’re wrong.
I said the other week we’d be doing very well if we got away with anything under 20k deaths and you came charging in to shoot me down with a quote of Neil Ferguson saying the 5k figure and pointing out he was a lot more qualified than me to be making that assertion.
I am just pointing out that in that sense I will therefore be proved to be far more correct than he was.
Simple.
So because they didn’t include the word “confirmed” you miss their entire point?I'm not interested in saving face mate.
They used the term infected. I said err.... no.
the rest is gravy.
I know what you mean, a close relative had the same happen to her several years ago when she was virtually brain dead.
However, my mother who died a few years ago had her life shortened by hospital policy about the elderly and non resuscitation after her stoke that got her there despite being mentally aware, just because of her age.
Do you think old and young people who suffer similar underlying problems but are both mentally alert will be treated the same?
Me: I’ve got dog shit on my shoe,So just to get this straight, you think you will be proven right in saying Ferguson is clueless by agreeing with his teams report that under 20k would be doing well?
Or are you claiming to have come up with the 20,000 figure yourself?
Fake responseThe Glasgow care home patients that we know about, because people said they died from coronavirus and were not infact swept under the rug but brought to national attention as possible coronavirus deaths?
Yes, I can see how that really plays into your "secret care home deaths covered up" conspiracy.
Guess we're witnessing today's online scrap.
No it doesn’t. It literally talks about their CASE fatality rate being lower because they do more tests:No I didn't miss any point.
The article attempts to infer that Germany has a lower IFR. It doesn't.