BosnianBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Jan 2019
- Messages
- 4,003
- Team supported
- City
he was shilling his drug and companies saying he asked them to go to London to help treating Johnson. He's unbelievable.
Oh, I see.
You do need to translate it from Swedish.that headline doesn't match the report it references.
There is little doubt that Mr Trump has done everything he can to reward those companies who contributed to his election fund.The reason he's banging on about those drugs is because the company paid $1m to Trump's lawyer.
Regardless of whether you like him or not the US is the leading nation in the world. Trump is a loose cannon. He can't keep his counsel therefore it's worth listening to him not so you can swallow his propaganda but so you can find out what is being worked on.There is little doubt that Mr Trump has done everything he can to reward those companies who contributed to his election fund.
If he can claim a victory in saving the life of Boris job done. The man is transparent.
Fair point Marvin, I'm not saying he is wrong by the way simply that he always has a motive that rewards those who donate to his election prospects.Regardless of whether you like him or not the US is the leading nation in the world. Trump is a loose cannon. He can't keep his counsel therefore it's worth listening to him not so you can swallow his propaganda but so you can find out what is being worked on.
I’d say that those who have discounted his proposed therapeutics out of hand could be in for a shock. The question I’d ask is what’s in for him to recommend a drug that turns out to be a dud? If he pushes this therapy in the teeth of opposition from the media and it turns out to save American lives it could turn out to be a game changer in the fight against the virus and therefore in his re-election campaign.Fair point Marvin, I'm not saying he is wrong by the way simply that he always has a motive that rewards those who donate to his election prospects.
How is he possibly qualified to objectively and effectively evaluate the efficacy of any therapeutic?I’d say that those who have discounted his proposed therapeutics out of hand could be in for a shock. The question I’d ask is what’s in for him to recommend a drug that turns out to be a dud? If he pushes this therapy in the teeth of opposition from the media and it turns out to save American lives it could turn out to be a game changer in the fight against the virus and therefore in his re-election campaign.
I’d say that those who have discounted his proposed therapeutics out of hand could be in for a shock. The question I’d ask is what’s in for him to recommend a drug that turns out to be a dud? If he pushes this therapy in the teeth of opposition from the media and it turns out to save American lives it could turn out to be a game changer in the fight against the virus and therefore in his re-election campaign.
The greatest thread ever.Tremendous thread this.
Is there anything he doesn't know a lot about?
Whats in it for him? Plenty, and for key Republican donors who have vested financial interests in the companies making it. Kushner is (shock!) reportedly financially linked also. Your post is more than a bit naive dont you think?I’d say that those who have discounted his proposed therapeutics out of hand could be in for a shock. The question I’d ask is what’s in for him to recommend a drug that turns out to be a dud? If he pushes this therapy in the teeth of opposition from the media and it turns out to save American lives it could turn out to be a game changer in the fight against the virus and therefore in his re-election campaign.
It's a gamble, like all his other business deals.I’d say that those who have discounted his proposed therapeutics out of hand could be in for a shock. The question I’d ask is what’s in for him to recommend a drug that turns out to be a dud? If he pushes this therapy in the teeth of opposition from the media and it turns out to save American lives it could turn out to be a game changer in the fight against the virus and therefore in his re-election campaign.
Business, Politics and being a half decent human.
Because, at best, it’s a bet. He’s not qualified to make that distinction as to what Americans should or should not try at this time. That’s why there are fucking medical trials first.I’d say that those who have discounted his proposed therapeutics out of hand could be in for a shock. The question I’d ask is what’s in for him to recommend a drug that turns out to be a dud? If he pushes this therapy in the teeth of opposition from the media and it turns out to save American lives it could turn out to be a game changer in the fight against the virus and therefore in his re-election campaign.
He's betting against peoples lives.Because, at best, it’s a bet. He’s not qualified to make that distinction as to what Americans should or should not try at this time. That’s why there are fucking medical trials first.