The story makes no sense and is absolutely full of contradictions.
- It's shifted multiple times over the years, only very recently including anything about the alleged assault and contemporaneous witnesses that she claims she told dispute the story completely.
- Her other witnesses are her brother and her deceased mother, not exactly unbiased.
- The shifts in her story include important stuff like the actual assault but also other details that serve to erode her legitimacy, like how she mistook driving cross country (a 39 hour drive) to being on an airplane.
- She repeatedly praised Biden on Twitter both generally, and specifically related to his work on women's issues, as recently at a year and half ago.
- The story makes no sense in the context the early 90's being a moment of heightened awareness around sexual assault owing to Anita Hill as well as two other huge scandals involving Senators. We're supposed to believe Biden assaulted her in a public place in this environment (seems extremely reckless/insane and out of character). And also supposed to believe that she didn't report it because it would've been unheard of (it wouldn't have been).
- Her Russia posts are absolutely nuts and don't exactly point to someone of sound mind
So yeah, I'm probably going to pass on labeling her as a rock solid teller of truth.