Deal agreed with Bayern Munich for Leroy Sane - €60m (including add-ons)

Status
Not open for further replies.
chesterbells said:
If he had stayed would he have had the same opportunities as Foden?

Don't have a time machine so can't really comment except that due to Sane s injury, probably plenty.


He left a year before Sane was injured, doubt he had the patience to sit through that year as Foden did.
 
He never had our badge and sponsor in the first place.

He had a generic badge with what looked like a hand in a shield shape and no sponsor:
nintchdbpict000325758478.jpg
Ah my Misake, I thought he get a black band put across it. I must be thinking of another terrible tattoo
 
Classic bit on the BBC website - quoting Bild (Bayern’s mouthpiece) that Sane is off to Munich - but just to get a few clicks the BBC manipulate the Bild story to say Havertz is off to Liverpool - which the Beeb know is utter bullshit but they can’t help themselves.

It happens on a daily basis on the BBC , a positive story about the Rags or Dippers alongside a City negative , they dont even try to hide it now , they are a public funded media outlet who have clearly shown a towards the 'istree clubs for years. As soon as Boris de-criminalises non payment of the licence fee , the better.
Wouldnt miss the BBC if they shut their doors tomorrow.
 
If he had stayed would he have had the same opportunities as Foden? Sturridge left us in similar circumstances didn’t he? I don’t know anything about the players mentality and you say you can’t fault him for leaving at 17, but I think I would at least question it (esp if he was promised the same pathway as Foden for example).

The big difference was always gonna be that Phil was a City fan; t'other guy wasn't.
 
There is another option - you find a club attractive enough that Sane would also now consider it - we use his own ego and subjective value at this stage so both clubs can claim the better end of the bargain?

If we approached Barcelona and offered Sane plus cash for one or two of their players - even put up a Hail Mary on Messi?

Same goes for Real Madrid or Juventus. They all have people who might be surplus for whatever reasons and would certainly improve our own strength.

I like this so much I quoted it
 
So he won the league all by himself?

He beat Schalke all by himself?

And he scored against the rags you say?

How is he a scapegoat and how exactly did we 'handle this badly'?
No and I never suggested he did, but he made significant contributions to 2 of our best ever seasons. Yeah he did score against the rags? Yeah he had 2 great games against Schalke.

He's a scapegoat because despite being one of the best wingers in the world, any lack of tracking back or failing a couple of dribbles is seen as him being inconsistent or mentally weak. We handled it badly because we allowed his contract to wind down so much we'll be lucky to get £60mil for him.
 
There is another option - you find a club attractive enough that Sane would also now consider it - we use his own ego and subjective value at this stage so both clubs can claim the better end of the bargain?

If we approached Barcelona and offered Sane plus cash for one or two of their players - even put up a Hail Mary on Messi?

Same goes for Real Madrid or Juventus. They all have people who might be surplus for whatever reasons and would certainly improve our own strength.
What’s your thinking on the window though. If they are still planning to finish the season in June/ July will it need to be the same squads. So a short window in August was my thoughts. Or will contract dates mean players out of contract like Silva can’t play.
 
Rumenigge is a tight arse , he will not pay Sane £300k a week for sitting on his backside waiting for football to re-emerge , this will go down to the end of the year , the German Rags probably already have an agreement with Sane and his agent , let City be the mugs and pay your salary until the end of the year and we will offer £40m take it or leave it.
It appears if your a 'istree club you do not have to agree a fee with the club before talking to the player , quite sure if we were doing the same with Lewandoski ,Rumennige and his mates wouldnt be too happy , but we have to lie down and let the German Rags trample all over us.
 
As much as I can’t stand Terrence Trent D’Arby, I think you’re thinking of something else because it was in the middle of the pitch and he only tripped him. Leroy’s injury came after the trip and was all his own body weight, when he planted his foot into the ground and his knee came down over his foot with all his body weight and opened up his knee joint.

Ok thanks for that. I thought after reading your post and letting it sink in that my disdain for young Trent would have lessened. Nope. Haha
 
What’s your thinking on the window though. If they are still planning to finish the season in June/ July will it need to be the same squads. So a short window in August was my thoughts. Or will contract dates mean players out of contract like Silva can’t play.

I'm not sure pal, and I don't think those in charge are. I'm sure clubs would be allowed to offer out of contract players rolling monthly deals until the season is concluded, but it must ultimately come down to what that particular player wants.

I know Willian is already on record saying he wants to see out the season with Chelsea before moving on - can see the same with our Dave.
 
I like this so much I quoted it

I'd make a FINAL power play for Messi using Cancelo (£50m) and Leroy (£70m)- there is talk Messi is allowed to walk for nothing this summer but I don't think he would want to damage his legacy by triggering that clause.

However...

We could also chuck them £20m to take Semedo.

See how Uefa fancy ad revenues without Messi in the Champions League ;)

Bayern will be a powerful pull for someone like Sane.

Not as much as Barca or Madrid, though.

That's how you change the equation.
 
No and I never suggested he did, but he made significant contributions to 2 of our best ever seasons. Yeah he did score against the rags? Yeah he had 2 great games against Schalke.

He's a scapegoat because despite being one of the best wingers in the world, any lack of tracking back or failing a couple of dribbles is seen as him being inconsistent or mentally weak. We handled it badly because we allowed his contract to wind down so much we'll be lucky to get £60mil for him.

Thought there is a contract offer to him which he has been refusing to sign for getting on for two years ?
 
Thought there is a contract offer to him which he has been refusing to sign for getting on for two years ?
And that's because he's somehow become 4th choice winger despite being one of our best players and having arguably the highest potential. We should have given him a final offer of £300k p/w, and if he says no, stick him on the market.
 
And that's because he's somehow become 4th choice winger despite being one of our best players and having arguably the highest potential. We should have given him a final offer of £300k p/w, and if he says no, stick him on the market.

And potentially fuck the wage structure up ?

Maybe the management don't agree with your assessment of the player .

Your suggestions sounds like it's from the Ed Woodward school of player contracts.
 
I don't know why people are surprised that the valuation of him will have dropped signficantly. That shipped sailed last summer when his future should have been sorted in June.

Obviously it was subject to some unforeseen circumstances with him picking up a season ending injury, but all parties faffed around for too long and whilst it's not necessarily us to blame, I think we should have been more receptive to selling a player that clearly didn't want to be here and as much as he was 'our player', he shouldn't have played in that community shield match as it was obvious his head wasn't here anymore.

But it's all in hindsight and we now find ourselves in an even greater unforeseen situation with a player with 1 year left on his contract and coming off a nasty injury with question marks over whether a player that relies on his physical attributes will get back to his best.

It's the time to be realistic and bite the bullet, get a reasonable offer instead of pushing for a figure no one is again willing to pay for and risk losing him for nothing, when we can still get enough value out of him to reinvest in a geniune world class requirement at CB.
 
No, the same Sancho who left despite a very, very good contract on the table.



Don't have a time machine so can't really comment except that due to Sane s injury, probably plenty.



No, Chelsea tapped him up.



He was 17 when he left but was 16 (maybe even still 15) when he'd decided he was going, he'd had a contract on the table for quite awhile that would have made him the highest paid teenager in the EPL at least. Even Sancho himself has mentioned his attitude problems while at Dortmund (let alone us), with turning up late for training time and again for starters.

Thanks for that. And those are some of reasons I’m reluctant.
 
And potentially fuck the wage structure up ?

Maybe the management don't agree with your assessment of the player .

Your suggestions sounds like it's from the Ed Woodward school of player contracts.
Sounds more like a fair price for someone who could be one of the best players in the world in a few years. And if he said no, we know he's just stringing us along and we should sell.

The cost of replacing such a player is far greater than any increase in wages.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top