SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,597
You’ve not remotely upset me, you’re just making idiotic points.Sorry if I’ve upset you (not really) getting on the back of vile outlets like The Daily Mail
and The Sun.
You’ve not remotely upset me, you’re just making idiotic points.Sorry if I’ve upset you (not really) getting on the back of vile outlets like The Daily Mail
and The Sun.
You’ve not remotely upset me, you’re just making idiotic points.
Found this really interesting . Quite a few graphs showing us the amount of people that have died with pre existing conditions.https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopula...d19englandandwales/deathsoccurringinapril2020
Good analysis of death profiles from ons in april.
the risk factor of age is incredible .
well whatever I say you’ll disagree.
personally I find The Times, FT and Independent, the economist, Reuters pretty balanced.
broadcast wise the BBC; seen as every right wing hothead labels the BBC as ‘leftwing biased’ and every left wing hothead says ‘it’s right wing government funded’!
Absolutely disgusting from the Daily Mail, I knew they were a joke - but didn't think they would sink to this level.
![]()
I had. Hence my question as you seemed to have missed the point being made about why teachers are concerned.
Agreed!This is a bit OTT,
https://www.france24.com/en/2020040...-duterte-warns-coronavirus-lockdown-violators
But I hope our police do not show any sympathy for any morons taking part. None. Charge them and arrest them on the spot. Heavy fines, criminal records please. None of this "understanding" policing bollocks.
This is not a fucking game. Tens, even hundreds of thousands of lives are at stake. No time for pussy footing about.
The media creates that divide. That’s their objective. Papers like The Daily Mail and The Sun are feeding poison into our society. There’s nothing tedious about standing against that.
“Some papers are against Hiter, some are for him. It’s just the way the world is. Bashing the Mail for this is tedious.”![]()
See how this retort doesn’t quite hold up?
The SNP supported the Nazis, and the Republic Of Ireland enjoyed a fairly close relationship with the 3rd Reich, in fact they signed a book on condolence after Hitlers reported death. Singling out the DM is just point scoring bud.
And guess what? They’re were all a ****ing disgrace.
I’m highlighting about The Daily Mail because that’s the paper we’re talking about.
Is this the world we live in now where disgusting rags like that paper are being defended and getting on their case results in being accused of ‘points scoring’?
Unbelievable.
It's a popular paper, you might not like it and I see it as a comic, full of tattle. What I don't and wont do is refer back to the second world war and use that as an example of their editorial stance now.
I don't know of one paper or news outlet that isn't tainted by money right now.
Tbf, it is their editorial stance now.
And guess what? They’re were all a ****ing disgrace.
I’m highlighting about The Daily Mail because that’s the paper we’re talking about.
Is this the world we live in now where disgusting rags like that paper are being defended and getting on their case results in being accused of ‘points scoring’?
Unbelievable.
And guess what? They’re were all a ****ing disgrace.
I’m highlighting about The Daily Mail because that’s the paper we’re talking about.
Is this the world we live in now where disgusting rags like that paper are being defended and getting on their case results in being accused of ‘points scoring’?
Unbelievable.
you are the one who brought up the daily mail. Nobody was defending them at all, it’s a shite paper.
I have never seen a single poster on bluemoon saying that The daily mail is a good read.
We were having a debate about how tiresome politics and the media has become as it’s so partisan and you thought posting a 100 year old headline from the daily mail with hitler on it added to the general debate?
now you are having imaginary arguments with voices in your head about people supporting the daily mail?
I think we can all safely agree that the Mail is a truly awful publication, so let's get back on topic.
I know the thread is trying to move away from this topic but even if teachers were ordered to go back to work, is there any evidence to suggest parents are also willing to send their kids back? The government thought pupils weekly attendance would be at 20%, yet it’s only just above 2%.