You have to remember mate, we did not actually accept a reduced punishment last time, it certainly wasn't on the premise of guilt.
It was purely for cosmetic purposes, a behind-closed doors arrangement between us and Infantino.
It was hoped that it would be sufficient to keep the usual lobbyists off our backs, that's the only mistake we made.
This is now about the immediate viability of the club and the investment made in it by Abu Dhabi.
If you take a step back, which is difficult for all Blues, the questions need to be much more nuanced?
Who stands to lose more, City or Sheikh Mansour?
City would always continue to exist as a football entity, but does anyone really think Sheikh Mansour isn't looking at this with dispassionate optics?
His is a fight for a £3bn investment, which, for most multi-billionaires, means they don't leave anything to chance or surprise.