King KdB of Belgium
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2018
- Messages
- 1,228
What I mean is that they will not be able to print any new stories, or make up anything at all. Everything that they print or say has to be already in the public domain.
How are we going to sue them for (say) £50m if we stop them making anything up?What I mean is that they will not be able to print any new stories, or make up anything at all. Everything that they print or say has to be already in the public domain.
What I mean is that they will not be able to print any new stories, or make up anything at all. Everything that they print or say has to be already in the public domain.
How are we going to sue them for (say) £50m if we stop them making anything up?
Wasn’t it “we do what we want” which I took to be a sarcastic imitation of the United chant?Absolutely not. He is not involved in any of the stolen correspondence.
Bareda, Chullimas and Pearce.
As I say, one troubling response was 'we can do what we want'
Can't recall the context.
We should probably sue everyone for £50m each as well.The time has now come as we nearer to the date of of case with CAS. To issue a blanket gagging order, so that papers, broadcasters are not allowed print or say anything about our case.
They will only be able to say in general terms about the case, e.g. This is the first day of the case, with Manchester City giving their evidence.
You’ve set the bench mark I’ll say 4864.2 Weeks to go
Wonder how many pages this will have reached by then?
My guess 4500
Re-reading some of the leaks articles from 2018 I can't find reference to the HH email but did find this email from Chumilas to Pearce about the money flow through Etihad:
“I need to understand the mechanism by which additional sponsorship flows through ADUG:
Is it: ADUG Shareholder->>ADUG->>Etihad->>MCFC?
Or is it rather: ADUG Shareholder->>Etihad->>MCFC?"
In this context who is ADUG Shareholder? Logically it is Sheikh Mansour unless it is code for something else.
what did Swiss Ramble Conn and the professor say as to why it’s not a smoking gun like the media etc think ?
We should probably sue everyone for £50m each as well.
Will any journos be allowed to be 'in' the courtroom?
Just wondering when it starts, will we have any sort of updates from as to how it's going
I was told by a source that football journalists at both The Guardian and The Telegraph got memos telling them what position to take on Project Restart. It's not therefore beyond the bounds of possibility that Conn took one line then was told to do a volte face.Can’t speak for the first two but I recall when the Der Spiegel articles were first published Conn was on record as saying he didn’t think the allegations were a big deal. Since then he’s gone full circle and decided to go all in on us which totally contradicts his original stance.
Having already been criticised by CAS over leaks, they wouldn't dare.I would imagine not expect some leaking from the Uefa side though if it’s going shit for us.
Having already been criticised by CAS over leaks, they wouldn't dare.
Wasn’t it “we do what we want” which I took to be a sarcastic imitation of the United chant?
Or even false leaks, the sneaky bastards.Another revenue stream to comply with financial fair play
I would imagine not expect some leaking from the Uefa side though if it’s going shit for us.
We need that city fan who live screened the city game at Crystal Palace a few seasons ago :)Will any journos be allowed to be 'in' the courtroom?
Just wondering when it starts, will we have any sort of updates from as to how it's going
Will any journos be allowed to be 'in' the courtroom?
Just wondering when it starts, will we have any sort of updates from as to how it's going