Remember all those times when Nicky Reid would sprint out of the tunnel, letters missing out of the North Stand scoreboard, but the tannoy would always play loud and proud...
The Boys in Blue never give in!
Wishful thinking
The dark forces will not influence CAS.Their baneful prescence will not be there. So they will not affect this verdict, but will wait until the next time.Dark forces involved here, have a feeling it will be upheld because what we are against however, when it does I think we will unleash hell. Its a long game.
Some?? I don't think you see the bigger picture.I can’t help think that some of football is rotten to the core. As a result I don’t think city will win this. The establishment won’t allow it to happen. Fear the worst and hope for the best.
Courage, mes enfants, courage.I can’t help think that some of football is rotten to the core. As a result I don’t think city will win this. The establishment won’t allow it to happen. Fear the worst and hope for the best.
You’ll always hear us singinggggggggggg, Etihad paid all the way.Even if we’re playing down at Maine Road, or even at the court of arbitration...
Yes he's right. From a narrow point of view, I'd probably take a 1 year ban but when you think about it, Man Utd and Liverpool and their boys in the media will just keep up their incessant criticism. There can be no middle ground.Tolm is bob on.
Fuck that.
We are innocent and nothing less than that will do.
You spelt cook wrong ;)*gulps - I'm just a cook.
You spelt cook wrong ;)
General point. Neither side really wants to go to CAS (whatever City say). If City's advice was anything but confident and strong, they would have found a way to settle this matter (today if need be). That is not to say the advice is "you will win" but it must be advice that they should have the best of the arguments. I'm pretty sure UEFA would happily take a one year ban - if we really thought we were likely to lose, I think we would take it.
It may cut it dead but only having considered all of the case. They won't stop it half way through and say "I agree, case closed"Agree with that Stefan however having listened very carefully to your 93:20 pod & subsequent written version, it would appear that the case could be statute barred. Which could surely cut it dead. I know you said that it was such an obvious error that you worry ! Thoughts please
Just waded through the previous CAS judgement, hard going but understandable!
Thanks
I'll drag it into the gutter Marvin if it all goes tits up ;-)Yes he's right. From a narrow point of view, I'd probably take a 1 year ban but when you think about it, Man Utd and Liverpool and their boys in the media will just keep up their incessant criticism. There can be no middle ground.
(I notice that the Newcastle takeover - an authentic state takeover, as opposed to one state functionary - has barely been discussed which kind of suggests that their concerns about nation state's investments in football were a complete sham).
Some interesting and well informed comment in this topic in recent days. Thanks to all concerned.
We accept nothing is the stance from the club and rightly so. And I hope we expose every corrupt wanker at UEFA and every corrupt wanker at every corrupt club.Just a thought, I wonder if we would be fine with just accepting a fine with NO ban, or would even that be an admission of guilt?
Depends how the fine is described, e.g.Just a thought, I wonder if we would be fine with just accepting a fine with NO ban, or would even that be an admission of guilt?
Settlements generally are not an admission of the breach or "guilt". In fact they usually specifically say the exact opposite - ie that the parties don't accept any breaches actually took place.Just a thought, I wonder if we would be fine with just accepting a fine with NO ban, or would even that be an admission of guilt?
It may cut it dead but only having considered all of the case. They won't stop it half way through and say "I agree, case closed"
How do these hearings by video work, will all our legal reps be together at some location?
And how long would the working day generally be at a hearing such as this?
Thanks.