FFP is really good for City now, bar this old case investigation.I would imagine we will be quite pro FFP once they stop trying to boot us out of Europe - we are a profitable club
or this
One thing that occurred to me today, specifically in relation to Tony Evans article yesterday, stating that UEFA convicted us on the basis of our own submissions. The only thing I can think of is that some of our submissions in March/ April conflicted with submissions in 2012-14. Other than that I’m stumped.
One other point, our case will have no bearing on FFP going forward, it’s not about the validity of FFP so a win for us doesn’t mean the end of FFP.
It will, however, have far more of a bearing on the premier league. A win should mean champions football next season and all that entails. Defeat and united will get a much needed cash injection plus we suffer huge issues with holding onto our best players and of course future recruitment.
If (a huge if) we achieved a stunning victory and UEFA is totally routed leading to the collapse of FFP would Sheikh Mansour pour in huge sums to bring in players such as Mbappe for instance?
I highly doubt it as he has finished the investment phase and now he is looking for organic growth.
G14 is about to get their wishes answered by UEFA. They are slowly and slowly putting into reality their "history" closed league. UEFa is following the script written by ECA/Agnelli.Correct, but it might persuade G14 to break away and/or push hard for a closed shop euro cup. After all, they would lose the power to stop us.
G14 is about to get their wishes answered by UEFA. They are slowly and slowly putting into reality their "history" closed league. UEFa is following the script written by ECA/Agnelli.
You are putting too much weight into CAS decision. If City is banned, they will rejoiced and feast. If City isn't banned, Tebas and co. will keep yelling you are cheats and need to be punished. And they'll create new rules in FFP to make you lose any advantage you can hold over them : future "luxury tax" in pipeline. All that while keeping strategical advantage for themselves : historical coefficient prize money.
It is utopian to think UEFA or G14 will crumble over this. They will just try and retry with a new trick.
I didn’t think our appeal was that FFP was wrong, I thought it was that we had not breached FFP? That being the case I’m not sure that a successful appeal would bring FFP down?
FFP is really good for City now, bar this old case investigation.
Imagine Newcastle with the Saudi monarchy money. They could easily outbid anyone. Not so much with FFP. City has already built its revenue and is one of the most powerful club financially.
Still, FFP is a scam benefitting the old European Football Monarchy first and foremost. As such, i will always be against it.
The Guardian Football Weekly Podcast is wank.It's mentioned briefly in the Guardian's Football Weekly podcast. You will not be surprised to hear that:
They have clearly never even considered the case if they think it's that straightforward.
- They want us to lose - they said that.
- They don't think we have any case at all because the Der Spiegel emails said it all.
It's not worth listening to. They don't have any information, but they never fail to annoy.
Haven't they changed the rules again so clubs with new money are allowed to spend money? Saw somewhere that newcastle will be able to spend as long as they prove they've got a long term plan.
ok, ta. So that’s...
liverpool
Leicester
Chelsea
united
Wolves
Spurs
Arsenal
Burnley
The Guardian was associated with Der Spiegel and Mediapart (EIC) in the Football Leaks reporting. Not surprised they want City to be banned.The Guardian Football Weekly Podcast is wank.
The Guardian was associated with Der Spiegel and Mediapart (EIC) in the Football Leaks reporting. Not surprised they want City to be banned.
I think you can add every British tabloid, media outlet, tv sports company, and radio stations to the list.The Guardian was associated with Der Spiegel and Mediapart (EIC) in the Football Leaks reporting. Not surprised they want City to be banned.
I'm just reading Alan Rusbridger's book 'Breaking News' about his time at the Guardian & how the media is evolving. The Guardian & Der Spiegel are absolutely in bed together and have been for a while. So that hardly comes as a surprise.It's mentioned briefly in the Guardian's Football Weekly podcast. You will not be surprised to hear that:
They have clearly never even considered the case if they think it's that straightforward.
- They want us to lose - they said that.
- They don't think we have any case at all because the Der Spiegel emails said it all.
It's not worth listening to. They don't have any information, but they never fail to annoy.
Fingers crossed.I think the only way we will get any leaks is if it is going well For UEFA, they will not be able to help themselves through their usual sources, so I am hoping we hear nothing from the corrupt cúntz...
A banner you say? Who could possibly object to that.
The banner should say:-
"The Dirty Eight
(Names)
Never Forgiven"
The Hateful Eight
You keep telling us to not to read/listen/ comment on the guardian but you do it all the timeIt's mentioned briefly in the Guardian's Football Weekly podcast. You will not be surprised to hear that:
They have clearly never even considered the case if they think it's that straightforward.
- They want us to lose - they said that.
- They don't think we have any case at all because the Der Spiegel emails said it all.
It's not worth listening to. They don't have any information, but they never fail to annoy.
I am pershuaded by your submishi - shubmissi - your point.