WHO are now claiming that asymptomatic spread is rare.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/08/asy...-arent-spreading-new-infections-who-says.html
This is one helluva claim, and it needs backing up. They say they've tracked asymptomatic cases and found very few cases of others being infected too. This needs more context - were these cases pre-covid being common knowledge? If so, fair enough. If not, it needs validating because the world hugely changed their actions when it became a pandemic due to social distancing etc. If so, it could be the real reason it hasn't spread much from asymptomatic cases is because people have social-distanced, not because of medical reasons.
If these asymptomatic cases didn't lead others despite them going about their usual routines (hugging family/friends, working in close contact with others, no masks etc) then that's a different thing entirely. We need to know that distinction. It doesn't add up with some other stuff we've learned too.
For example, the Amsterdam choir case. Mass spreader, during a show. 100 out of 130 or sumat got really ill, a few died. There's no way anyone's performing as normal with a respiratory based ill. Would last about 2 mins. Surely that person was asymptomatic, but still spread it? Doesn't correlate with this idea that they barely spread it. Just one example, but i'm sure there's plenty.