Without me reading all of this, can someone tell me when they announce their verdict?
Sometime in July.
Without me reading all of this, can someone tell me when they announce their verdict?
Sometime between tomorrow and the end of AugustWithout me reading all of this, can someone tell me when they announce their verdict?
I'm pretty sure the Open Skies case proved it was ADEC (not ADUG) that stepped in to meet the liabilities of Etihad. Furthermore, the reference to 'HH' in an email written by Simon Pearce was not Sheikh Mansour; a key distinction in local etiquette that Pearce would have known.
His boss has taken it on instead
Any rumours why Pannick didn't take the case and is she as good?Plenty of positivity at CFA today, certainly no inkling that we have had a bad couple of days.
Sounds like Monica is on it and not Pannick?
People like him thrive on a challengeOr, he said I'm not taking the case it could harm my reputation
You mean, like, he's a gooner?That’s an assumption. Perhaps more likely that his previous cases & involvement with other UAE countries caused a conflict of interest??
I know it’s probably been explained to me already and I lack the financial savvy to understand it, but this just seems to be at the heart of everything to me, and everything else about City having bona fide accounts, etc, etc, is just flim flam.
Did Sheikh Mansour directly fund Etihad out of his own pocket with a view to Etihad then returning that money to City’s coffers as sponsorship? And if so, would that action constitute a breach of FFP under the broad church of owner investment? Somebody help me please.....!
Who the fuck is our lawyer?Any rumours why Pannick didn't take the case and is she as good?
Seen someone else answer it,she is his bossWho the fuck is our lawyer?
No it didn’t, all that proved was that Adec were covering some of the other sponsorships (Well, not even that, just that it was a proposal mooted in 2010 and Etihad denied it actually happened). I didn’t say anything about the reference to HH, in terms of the emails, they explicitly state ADUG direct to us, which is the key bit.
Without me reading all of this, can someone tell me when they announce their verdict?
Who the fuck is our lawyer?
I'm stealing that for mine.A quote on her profile describes her as "devastatingly effective". Think we did alright with this one.
Any rumours why Pannick didn't take the case and is she as good?
Monica - MCF(Q)C. Looking at the profile of hers and that Harris fella - I would say we are in good hands.
Sounds like we're using the company behind that Jason Bourne set-up.
You know I’m not savvy on the complexities of ffp or CAS and legal technicalities,but we are all on tenterhooks over this City v uefa case and won’t know the outcome till July apparently,but with this information that we are negotiating for Havertz or trying too,could this or possibly other transfer targets we pursue that it could show we are extremely confident in the outcome of the CAS case ..edit should maybe have worded it better,as in if we start to pursue players in a few weeks time it could be a sign we are confident that CAS will rule in our favour,players wouldn’t be as willing to possibly sign if a 2 year ban is hanging over us ...
What’s I find interest is we are using Lawyers from Blackstone Chambers.
Charles Flint QC is part of their board and also works for UEFA’s AC chamber primarily dealing with FFP. I wonder if he was involved in City’s case at all?