George Floyd murder | Clashes between US police and protestors

Status
Not open for further replies.
There are hundreds of statues dedicated to non privileged people/ things.

Greyfriars Bobby in Edinburgh?
Titanic memorial in Belfast?
Robin Hood in Nottingham?
Mary Seacole in London?
None of whom got knighted, especially the one who didn't exist. Anyway, just saying the idea that removing a statue wipes away history is preposterous, the stories remain if you want to read more.
 
None of whom got knighted, especially the one who didn't exist. Anyway, just saying the idea that removing a statue wipes away history is preposterous, the stories remain if you want to read more.
Lies, as soon as all the Hitler statues got pulled down, everyone forgot all about him. Fact.
 
Well those WMDs were trained on Holland Park you know.
I was reminded about the fall of Iraq (and Libya) when the statue was pulled over on Bristol, a bit like the way Saddam Hussein and Gaddaffi's statues were pulled down by an oppressed local populace, although l do not recall middle aged student types jumping up and down with glee on the statues of the dictators.
I am sure those in Bristol were showing their anger in a very indirect way about the modern day slavery that exists through many places one being Libya. Or not.
In Iraq, they beat Saddam's statue with shoes, a massive insult.
 
I agree on telling the truth but we need to be careful that taught history isn't 'changed' to pass judgement.

The only way you can pass judgement on history is through your current morals and values which must be remembered did not apply or exist at the time. No-one is in a position to say whether something is truly right or wrong, we can only understand what happened and judge it accordingly.

Look at Ancient Egypt and the buildings built on the back of slave labour... The pyramids still stand and are regarded today as a world wonder... Should we declassify the Pyramids as a world wonder or even should Egyptians pull them down?

That has been discredited as a myth, it was the master craftsmen of the time.
 
None of whom got knighted, especially the one who didn't exist. Anyway, just saying the idea that removing a statue wipes away history is preposterous, the stories remain if you want to read more.

It doesn't wipe away history, you are right, but it does deminish the memory or in the case below, promote ignorance.

Last year we were in Shetland. In the small village we stayed in there was a memorial to the Shetland Bus. To my shame I'd never heard of it.

If that statue/ monument hadn't been there I still wouldn't know about it.

That's the point of them. Sure some were put up to massage egos but they are there to commemorate.

Keep them all. Even the ones dedicated to subjects we now find unpalatable.
 
In Iraq, they beat Saddam's statue with shoes, a massive insult.
Oh l thought that the old guy with the grey pony tail was barefoot out of choice but he had kindly lent his shoes out so everyone could insult the statue;)
 
A statue of Karl Marx would be fine though.

The hammer and sickle was used to deface a Peel statue at the weekend, probably one of the greatest symbols of communist oppression.

I've already said on here that the statue of Abraham Lincoln was also defaced... The guy who abolished slavery in the US and died for doing so...

Lincoln didn't endorse in a very small way the abolition of slavery to help black people, he did it as it was the only way he thought he could save the union.

He also wasn't of the opinion of "free the slaves and give them equal rights"

He once said if he could free all slaves to save the union he would do it, and if he could keep everyone enslaved to save the union he would do it.

http://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/greeley.htm

This still IMO doesn't diminish what happened as a result of his actions.
 
Removing statues is utterly futile and is the perfect demonstration of our 'instant fix' society. As a 'person of colour' (I hate that phrase) I find it ridiculous that this is happening. The only purpose it serves is to pander to the anger of black people by giving them a tangible display of action against that which they protested in their thousands against while also giving white people a sense of achievement by thinking they are addressing the problem 'head on'. I can tell you that both are an illusion, removing a statue will not in any way remove, reduce or iraducate rasicm, it will only make racist people more racist and angry and will probably anger people who were sympathetic to the BLM cause.

It's the ultimate act of virtue signalling and also the ultimate act in complete and utter pointless lunacy.

Even this very site has chose to get on the bandwagon and change the Bluemoon typeface to display the B, L and M of bluemoon to black.

Fuck off, whoever decided that was a good idea is deluded.

"Instant fix" is destroying the statues.

So, what's your argument about putting these type of statues in museums where they can be written about properly and schools/ students/ people can do their own research on them?

Surely, where statues are not revered, mostly ignored but still cast a shadow over modern day society, it is better to move forward with positive imagery that one can take inspiration from.

To think otherwise, is highly ignorant of moving society forward.

Oh and fuck off with your bullshit about the "BLM" lettering. You might find it 'virtue signalling' but we can't solve your self hate. What Ric has done with the 'Bluemoon' title is a sign of respect.

It didn't HAVE to be done and I think it's a fantastic gesture.
 
Not a good choice of words for a slogan.
It sounds rather one sided.
I prefer that all lives matter.



There's a section downstairs can start a debate in this if you wish to have a rational discussion on this.


Can we get back to enraged about the original topic and their wumming of their listeners to get money in?
 
The reason I am most annoyed about the UK statues being taken down is the fact that it allows all of the closet racists and right winged loons something to moan about rather than discuss the actual issue. It's a clear own goal in that respect.

Nah, what you're saying is that the racists want open display of the tyrannical rule of oppressors. That's been 'accepted' for decades.

Those same racists can't say shit if they were in museums, where they belong, as long as they're not destroyed.

They can lament their collective losses there.
 
Lincoln didn't endorse in a very small way the abolition of slavery to help black people, he did it as it was the only way he thought he could save the union.

He also wasn't of the opinion of "free the slaves and give them equal rights"

He once said if he could free all slaves to save the union he would do it, and if he could keep everyone enslaved to save the union he would do it.

http://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/greeley.htm

This still IMO doesn't diminish what happened as a result of his actions.

That was in a letter to be fair and it means saving the Union was more important than stopping slavery to him but he said 4 years earlier :

I have always hated slavery, I think as much as any Abolitionist.

It’s irrelevant though as his statue wasn’t touched, it’s a photoshop and has been fact checked as a false claim.
 
I agree on telling the truth but we need to be careful that taught history isn't 'changed' to pass judgement.

The only way you can pass judgement on history is through your current morals and values which must be remembered did not apply or exist at the time. No-one is in a position to say whether something is truly right or wrong, we can only understand what happened and judge it accordingly.

Look at Ancient Egypt and the buildings built on the back of slave labour... The pyramids still stand and are regarded today as a world wonder... Should we declassify the Pyramids as a world wonder or even should Egyptians pull them down?

We change history now to avoid passing judgement. We airbrush taught history to make sure it is palatable. British history is sanitised with all the bad bits largely removed. And it is incorrect to say our current morals and values did not exist then. There was a lot of heated debate about the morality of slavery at the time which is why it was eventually abolished and we are in a position to say whether something is truly right or wrong. Slavery and genocide are two for starters.

Look if you guys want to say that having a statue of a slaver who butchered thousands for money is okay then just say so without all this shit about Pyramids or whatever. And if it isn’t okay why the fuck are we arguing the toss over it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top