UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%

  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%

  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%

  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%
  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
If we do win the appeal and stay in the CL next season watch out for some dodgy decisions against Leicester - can't have a non-cartel team wasting a perfectly good CL place just because they've had a good season.
 
KS55 said:
And now the late night news:
@tolmie's hairdoo predicts an easy win for somebody. He can't say who as there is no song "Uefa" on utube.
Miggy characterises @projectriver as a time waster. Well it takes one to know one. @projectriver will evaluate and give a verdict later, referencing R57.
@karen7 demonstrates her iron discipline and sacks the entire City staff.
The king of Belgium decides not to sue anybody today. Pannick is relieved.
CAS result still not in as the quill pens need sharpening.
And it's Goodnight from me, James Alexander Gordon.
Click to expand...
I think you've deliberately buried one piece of fake news in there, just to check if people read it all.

I'm going for 'The king of Belgium decides not to sue anybody today.'
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
LOL. He is far more than Sheikh Mansour's sidekick. He is Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed's main man. When MBZ met Vladimir Putin, Putin asked for a one-to-one meeting with MBZ, without officials. MBZ agreed but only on condition that Khaldoon could be there.
Click to expand...
Mr Putin had the same trust in Mr A. the Chelsea owner when he formed his very first Cabinet. He asked him to speak with the candidates and give his opinion.
 
Graeme Souness said:
It’s ironic that a few short weeks ago, I said that I don’t care if we have broken rules put there deliberately and revised to “get us”. One of the regular posters rounded on me for having the temerity to even suggest that the club had done anything wrong. Yesterday, the same poster said on this thread, how would you feel about the club if we have been found to be in the wrong?

Hilarious! I will say again. Nobody knows if we have or haven’t broken these invented rules. In my opinion, the rules were put there for Manchester City and for Manchester City ONLY. I think other clubs have in the past (PSG) and will in the future break these rules. But UEFA will be choosy about where and when they are applied.

I don’t care what CAS do, City ‘til I die! The only thing I would say is that with Der Spiegel and Liverpool FC about, our internet security needs sorting out. I trust this has already been done.
Click to expand...
Graeme Souness might have said that, using exactly those words. Even the sentence construction is right. Uncanny. You aren't Graeme Souness are you?
 
Saddleworth2 said:
Graeme Souness might have said that, using exactly those words. Even the sentence construction is right. Uncanny. You aren't Graeme Souness are you?
Click to expand...
As I recall, I used to come on Bluemoon but never post. When the calls to sack (or save) Sven Goran Eriksson started, Graeme Souness was being mooted as a possible replacement. I remember most people being supportive of Sven, but you had the odd dissenting voice. When I read one of the posters being particularly scathing of him, I thought it would be funny to quote them and agree that he should be sacked if I set my account up in his name (Graeme having skin in the game as it were).

Tumbleweed.

Now I’m stuck with it.
 
Graeme Souness said:
As I recall, I used to come on Bluemoon but never post. When the calls to sack (or save) Sven Goran Eriksson started, Graeme Souness was being mooted as a possible replacement. I remember most people being supportive of Sven, but you had the odd dissenting voice. When I read one of the posters being particularly scathing of him, I thought it would be funny to quote them and agree that he should be sacked if I set my account up in his name (Graeme having skin in the game as it were).

Tumbleweed.

Now I’m stuck with it.
Click to expand...
Ahhhh the unusual 'Self-Clarkie'............
 
I've just looked and I've been blocked by him, makes I think now a full house of the bitter twats.

I am wondering how he's managed it? Is there some sort of tool to find people to block? Has he looked in general for #city posts or fine though his entire back history....it was pre-lockdown the last time I had a pop at him.
 
blue b4 the moon said:
I've just looked and I've been blocked by him, makes I think now a full house of the bitter twats.

I am wondering how he's managed it? Is there some sort of tool to find people to block? Has he looked in general for #city posts or fine though his entire back history....it was pre-lockdown the last time I had a pop at him.
Click to expand...

He’s probably gone through his entire post history on Twitter and individually blocked them all. What a fun weekend that must have been, suppose it’s more productive than writing them pieces of words he joins together he calls articles. At the same time lurking around on here, poor Miguel.
 
I read on here recently that a poster had reported him to his boss over his tweets and the boss replied he'd have a word with him. Perhaps he was told to clean up his twitter?
 
M18CTID said:
As much as Delooney blocking blues en masse could be a sign that he’s had a tip-off that it’s gone our way, I can’t honestly see it. Not a chance that lunatic fucker gets a scoop like that ahead of every other journalist.
Click to expand...

Maybe but I think it’s more to do with city fans calling him out as a racist with his slant on what he writes.
 
Shirley said:
I read on here recently that a poster had reported him to his boss over his tweets and the boss replied he'd have a word with him. Perhaps he was told to clean up his twitter?
Click to expand...
Probably, he's not exactly making the independent look great with his drunken slurs.
 
Silva2Aguero said:
I am very very confident about this. I have published another article entitled “Man City may have just replicated the 2012 comeback against QPR in its case against UEFA last week”

The article can be viewed at - https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/man-city-may-have-just-replicated-2012-comeback-against-joshua-levy/
Click to expand...

Another poster has already mentioned that Pannick didn't take City's case in the end. In addition, Ceferin's use of the word concrete to describe UEFA's case against City didn't mean cut and dried. In Slavic languages concrete means specific or actual. Ceferin's translation of the Slovenian word resulted an inaccurate meaning in English.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top